|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: How would you rank the album? | |||
Horrible! | 0 | 0% | |
Bad | 0 | 0% | |
Mediocre | 2 | 20.00% | |
Good | 2 | 20.00% | |
Very good | 3 | 30.00% | |
Brilliant! | 3 | 30.00% | |
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-07-2011, 03:52 AM | #1 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Caravan - For Girls Who Grow Plump in the Night (1973)
This is a discussion thread for the Caravan album For Girls Who Grow Plump In The Night from 1973. It was homework in the Prog & Fusion Album Club in March 2011.
Here's a rough description : Quote:
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
03-07-2011, 08:06 AM | #2 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
This is the album which started my personal interest in Canterbury. This one turned me onto In the Land of Grey and Pink which, after a bit of research, made me pick up Soft Machine's Third and then the ball was rolling.
There was something about this album and the place I was at both physically and mentally at the time of listening that, despite all it's feelgood and somewhat subtle nature, hit me like a brick. For a prog album from the 70s, I find it super accessible with some gorgeous pop hooks, but I guess it was the good naturedness of it which really made it stand out for me. It's like Caravan really want you to have a good time while listening to it, whether it's the first time you do it or the hundredth. Considering how avantgarde most of the scene is, that makes it a very good Canterbury entry album I think, particularly for those who like pop and rock from the 70s. Which song is my favourite changes, but generally I like tracks 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7 the most. At the moment, I think I like the last clutter of songs (track) the most perhaps. They are :
Something which is interesting if you look at that list of titles is Backwards which is a song also played by Soft Machine but not released by them at the time this album came out. Soft Machine's version was released later on the live album Noisette which was recorded in 1970. So, these kind of things interest me and perhaps they interest you too so here's Soft Machine's version if you want a comparison.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
03-07-2011, 09:08 AM | #3 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
As any good prog album, very impressive instrumentally. Nice lengthy songs, Albeit I found it to be very good, I can't call it excellent. Feel it's a tad too poppy sometimes. I mean the whole dual harmonized happy British vocal tone was a tad too kitschy for my tastes.
Regardless, the album has some very brilliant instrumental sections. Even if it lacks that unique quality that I would expect from a top shelf prog album, it's definitely a very solid showcase of true talent.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|