|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Favorite? | |||
Piper at the Gates of Dawn | 33 | 11.91% | |
Saucerful of Secrets | 4 | 1.44% | |
More | 2 | 0.72% | |
Ummagumma | 5 | 1.81% | |
Atom Heart Mother | 8 | 2.89% | |
Relics | 1 | 0.36% | |
Meddle | 20 | 7.22% | |
Obscured by Clouds | 2 | 0.72% | |
Dark Side of the Moon | 78 | 28.16% | |
Wish You Were Here | 34 | 12.27% | |
Animals | 47 | 16.97% | |
The Wall | 34 | 12.27% | |
The Final Cut | 2 | 0.72% | |
A Momentary Lapse of Reason | 3 | 1.08% | |
The Division Bell | 4 | 1.44% | |
Voters: 277. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-11-2010, 08:32 PM | #31 (permalink) |
Blue Bleezin' Blind Drunk
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The land of the largest wine glass (aka Lebanon)
Posts: 2,200
|
__________________
Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? |
06-11-2010, 08:39 PM | #33 (permalink) |
Blue Bleezin' Blind Drunk
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The land of the largest wine glass (aka Lebanon)
Posts: 2,200
|
Lame.
You're right about DSOTM being too smooth for its own good. I got my period of DSOTM binging, but after a while I play it, get nostalgic, then sick after 5 minutes. It's like a candy that is a bit too sweet.
__________________
Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? |
06-11-2010, 08:41 PM | #34 (permalink) |
Ba and Be.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
|
or too perfect. It lacks that organic quality that I associate with Pink Floyd. i think Obscured by Clouds blows it away personally.
__________________
“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
|
06-11-2010, 08:45 PM | #35 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
I don't have any problems with the slick production of DSOTM and later releases. I agree that it lacks the organic quality of earlier Floyd, but it represents another stage in the evolution of the band, mainly where they became masters of studio craft. I recall you saying it was the beginning of the end and I found that to be a really ridiculous statement because the only previous Floyd albums that can compete with DSOTM and the 3 albums that followed are Piper and Meddle.
|
06-11-2010, 08:52 PM | #37 (permalink) | |
Ba and Be.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
|
Quote:
The band love the album and have said so but they also said that there was nowhere to go after this album so I regard it indifferently.
__________________
“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
|
|
06-11-2010, 09:19 PM | #38 (permalink) | |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Quote:
Just because a band changes over the years isn't a bad thing, I know Pink Floyd started out as a certain kind of band but it would have gotten redundant if they remained that way for the rest of their career. I mean imagine if Flaming Lips never evolved from an average punk band or if Genesis never evolved from a mediocre Zombies clone or if David Bowie never evolved from writing music hall novelty songs, just because an artist was originally about one thing doesn't mean they can't change. What makes all these artists so enduring is the fact that they have evolved a lot. |
|
|