|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-18-2008, 04:34 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
|
Poppy prog vs other types: 1970s
I must admit not being particularly clued up on prog rock as a genre, but the types I am relatively familiar with are prog bands that are more on the poppy/melodic side of things - ya know, like Caravan and so forth. The whole sophisticated art rock sound/style with the clever layering and song structures but within a poppy framework. I find much of that stuff is comparable to (and clearly influenced by) the ideas contained in quite a bit of late late Bealtes material.
How do people feel about this style of prog? Positive thoughts, or a preference for 70s prog of a less melody-oriented style? Also, anybody who knows a lot about the topic, please feel free to educate me (and everyone else not in the know so to speak) a bit on the distinction between such types of prog. Thx |
04-18-2008, 05:33 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Ba and Be.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
|
Although their music barely touched upon prog. Barclay James Harvest are one of the best bands to produce quality pop/rock that could appeal to both sets of fans. Many people say that they were The Beatles successors. The album Once Again is an absolute 70's gem.
Dream theater is a given, theres also- Jethro Tull = Folk Rock Queensryche = Metal (very good at that) Fates Warning= yup Progressive Metal King's X= I can't see a lot of prog in their music but they are a vastly underated band. Tool=yup again! King Diamond= Metal.Plain and simple. Crimson Glory= Early stuff ditto. Opeth= melodic death metal Liquid Tension Experiment=Only band I have'nt heard.
__________________
“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
|
04-18-2008, 05:34 PM | #5 (permalink) |
Reformed Jackass
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
|
Well, this genre is ridiculously broad, you have the New Wave influenced King Crimson 80's trio, the very beginning of Collins-led Genesis, Jethro Tull (To a certain extent) , then you have Prog-Metal bands like Dream Theater and Tool which tend to be 'testosterone-fueled' and much more accessible.
|
04-18-2008, 06:06 PM | #6 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
|
I'm thinking more of the 70s scene. I'm familiar with prog in the prog metal / Tool sense very well, but know virtually F-all about the origins of the music. What I have seen however is that some of those prog bands are incredibly poppy and melodic and make me think of the late Beatles.
|
04-18-2008, 06:37 PM | #8 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
|
Quote:
Though the Beatles did it out of wild experimentation rather than trying to be arty....... then again, that would be getting into a discussion of intentions, which is pointless. I'm sure the prog bands didn't always take themselves too seriously, either. |
|
04-18-2008, 06:53 PM | #10 (permalink) |
Ba and Be.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
|
So are you trying to find similar bands that experimented with a traditional pop record asthetic or are you comparing this with the classically influenced dense sound of say King Crimson?
__________________
“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
|
|