![]() |
Poppy prog vs other types: 1970s
I must admit not being particularly clued up on prog rock as a genre, but the types I am relatively familiar with are prog bands that are more on the poppy/melodic side of things - ya know, like Caravan and so forth. The whole sophisticated art rock sound/style with the clever layering and song structures but within a poppy framework. I find much of that stuff is comparable to (and clearly influenced by) the ideas contained in quite a bit of late late Bealtes material.
How do people feel about this style of prog? Positive thoughts, or a preference for 70s prog of a less melody-oriented style? Also, anybody who knows a lot about the topic, please feel free to educate me (and everyone else not in the know so to speak) a bit on the distinction between such types of prog. Thx |
Eh, I think it can be great, just like any other genre. It's just most of the groups aren't.
|
Dream theater is a given, theres also-
Jethro Tull Queensryche Fates Warning King's X Tool King Diamond Crimson Glory Opeth Liquid Tension Experiment |
Although their music barely touched upon prog. Barclay James Harvest are one of the best bands to produce quality pop/rock that could appeal to both sets of fans. Many people say that they were The Beatles successors. The album Once Again is an absolute 70's gem.
Dream theater is a given, theres also- Jethro Tull = Folk Rock Queensryche = Metal (very good at that) Fates Warning= yup Progressive Metal King's X= I can't see a lot of prog in their music but they are a vastly underated band. Tool=yup again! King Diamond= Metal.Plain and simple. Crimson Glory= Early stuff ditto. Opeth= melodic death metal Liquid Tension Experiment=Only band I have'nt heard. |
Quote:
|
I'm thinking more of the 70s scene. I'm familiar with prog in the prog metal / Tool sense very well, but know virtually F-all about the origins of the music. What I have seen however is that some of those prog bands are incredibly poppy and melodic and make me think of the late Beatles.
|
Oh, you want to know the origins? Yah, The Beatles. I'll think of more later.
|
Quote:
Though the Beatles did it out of wild experimentation rather than trying to be arty....... then again, that would be getting into a discussion of intentions, which is pointless. I'm sure the prog bands didn't always take themselves too seriously, either. |
Yah, taking a 'far-out' type of music, adding in textured guitars etc. Those same songs are also very influential on Power Pop. Least it seems that way to me.
|
So are you trying to find similar bands that experimented with a traditional pop record asthetic or are you comparing this with the classically influenced dense sound of say King Crimson?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.