Prog Debate - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Prog & Psychedelic Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-02-2022, 12:12 PM   #61 (permalink)
Call me Mustard
 
rubber soul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Pepperland
Posts: 2,642
Default

Actually, if you want to talk about concept albums (forget about prog), you can say it really started with Frank Sinatra who made a series of thematic albums in the fifties.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pet_Sounds View Post
But looking for quality interaction on MB is like trying to stay hydrated by drinking salt water.
rubber soul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2022, 12:54 PM   #62 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
Default

Yep. What's the one: Night and Day or something? And I believe jazz artists also wrote albums based around themes too. Hell, you can go back to classical: what about Peer Gynt by Grieg or The Planets by Holst?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2022, 01:04 PM   #63 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Canada
Posts: 744
Default

Quote:
Nah, plenty of concept albums outside of prog
Fair point. I meant to say that a concept album is almost a requirement. Given that OK was being compared to so many others at the time, I would have believed that they were progressive, at the time. Nowadays, with the blips and beeps, etc, I wouldn't call that progressive.
music_collector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2022, 01:05 PM   #64 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Canada
Posts: 744
Default

Thanks for pointing that out. I'm just back from vacation (holiday to those outside North America, based on another thread), and I'm still in vacation mode.
music_collector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2022, 01:13 PM   #65 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
Default

Actually, if you're not a fan of prog, you might be surprised how few concept albums there are in the genre. I mean, more than any other, certainly, but of the big names, maybe one or two out of their discography. Genesis have one (The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway) maybe two (Duke?) while Marillion have two (Misplaced Childhood and Brave) and other bands have few or even none. It's definitely not a requirement, and in fact these days prog bands tend to shy away from it, as it's seen as typecasting them as such and unoriginal in many ways.
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2022, 01:58 PM   #66 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Canada
Posts: 744
Default

My knowledge of the progressive bands from that era is limited. I go back to The Wall, or Operation:Mindcrime, or 2112, or more recently, Coheed and Cambria's stuff, which is all part of one big story. That's more or less how I linked the progressive tag to the concept album.
music_collector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2022, 02:54 PM   #67 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

The way I see it, King Crimson is different from Pink Floyd who are different from Genesis who are different from Jethro Tull who are different from Emerson, Lake & Palmer who are different from Yes, Rush, National Health, Mothers of Invention and Gentle Giant.

The first wave of prog bands were diverse. That's what makes it so great and so much fun. It can very hard to set up rules because one or more of the founders will probably break it. Long songs? Gentle Giant didn't. Exotic instrumentation? ELP didn't. Weird time signatures? Pink Floyd generally didn't.

However, they were united in their want to elevate the rock band and their music to artistic heights and places not heard before. In doing that, they certainly didn't want to sound like eachother. They were after their own sound.

The treatment of prog as a strict genre is a very taxonomist view of music which doesn't work in any neat way. It's the prevailing attitude, but I find it somewhat embarrassing. The point wasn't to copy and confirm to genre rules and the bands that sound like that's what they're about generally get a pass from me.

For a time, I considered myself a proghead, but the term prog leaves me with a slight distaste these days. I prefer to describe myself as interested in avantgarde music, prog or otherwise.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2022, 08:34 AM   #68 (permalink)
From beyooond the graaave
 
Queen Boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The state that proudly brought you Disco Duck
Posts: 1,513
Default

Some people define prog rock by it's virtuosity and those tend to be the ones who contest Pink Floyd being prog because (aside from maybe Gilmour) they were not as technically gifted or flashy as their peers.

But it's never been about just chops, to me prog rock has always been a vibe, Floyd had it even if their approach was more simplistic.

Trying to limit prog rock to so many strict rules is missing the point of it, it's always been a very broad category, the boundries are kinda muddy and there will always be disagreements over what it really means to be prog and that's fine, it's nothing to get worked up about, genres are just a fun thing we made up to make exploring art easier to navigate, don't make a religion out of it.
__________________
https://www.twitch.tv/drrobuttnik

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
A whole bunch of stupid sh*t that I regret

Last edited by Queen Boo; 08-03-2022 at 08:55 AM.
Queen Boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2022, 08:41 AM   #69 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

I'm pretty sure they're contested as prog rock because of how cleanly they fit into the psychedelic rock genre. They're progressive but that doesn't seem to be a requirement for prog made after symphonic prog was established. All things considered, isn't it only the long songs and suites that connects them to prog standards?
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2022, 10:18 PM   #70 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Canada
Posts: 744
Default

This is starting to get complicated!
music_collector is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.