|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
![]()
It's the account of someone who spent a lot of time with Zappa, saw his behaviour and discussed women's lib and morals with him. She addressed what is understatedly called their double standard. How does your beef with a single slogan counter any of this?
__________________
Something Completely Different |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: NYC Man
Posts: 877
|
![]()
The paragraph about the double standard was talking about one of the Mothers. Who, we don't know. The next paragraph says that Zappa "didn't see her point of view," and she specifically gives the example of the woman protestor. If that example isn't relevant to evidencing what she interpreted as the different point of view, the example shouldn't be there. If it's relevant, I'm explaining what could easily be the source of an incorrect interpretation on her part. If there's more to it than that, more than just a claim that could be about an interpretation that Zappa wouldn't at all agree with, then she should have provided a bit more info.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|