|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Whos your favorite 70s prog band? | |||
Pink Floyd | 35 | 36.08% | |
Queen | 12 | 12.37% | |
Yes | 3 | 3.09% | |
King Crimson | 10 | 10.31% | |
ELP | 1 | 1.03% | |
Jethro Tull | 6 | 6.19% | |
Genesis | 4 | 4.12% | |
Roxy Music | 3 | 3.09% | |
Gentle Giant | 1 | 1.03% | |
Van Der Graff Generator | 1 | 1.03% | |
Camel | 2 | 2.06% | |
Gong | 0 | 0% | |
Hawkwind | 1 | 1.03% | |
Kraftwerk | 3 | 3.09% | |
Rush | 8 | 8.25% | |
Mahavishnu Orchestra | 4 | 4.12% | |
Other | 3 | 3.09% | |
Voters: 97. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-28-2008, 11:22 PM | #71 (permalink) |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Wasn't Kansas on there at one point?
...sigh. I wish Mahavishnu Orchestra weren't as short-lived as John Maclaughlin made them to be. Birds of Fire and The Inner Mounting Flame sh*t over most other discographies.
__________________
first.am |
11-29-2008, 03:43 AM | #72 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
I always thought the guitar was just slightly too far ahead in the mix on mounting flame. On many tracks, it concerns itself too much with being technically hard instead of good-sounding and is up in every other instruments face, making the overall sound slightly distractive.
I'm not saying I don't like it, though - everything but that is fine. I prefer Birds of Fire between the two, though.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
11-29-2008, 03:56 AM | #73 (permalink) | ||
I'm sorry, is this Can?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,989
|
I find that kind of mixing when it comes to do with guitars to be very very awesome
__________________
Quote:
|
||
11-30-2008, 12:22 AM | #74 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Kansas bleh, they're one of those bands that really give prog a bad reputation.
It seems whenever people badmouth prog, Kansas is always one of the examples they use. And when a third rate hick band that tried to dumb down the prog sound for the Lynyrd Skynyrd crowd is one of the bands people most associate with the genre, you know that's not a good thing. American prog bands just suck, Dream Theater anybody? I know there's a few exceptions. But for the most part, stick with the brits. |
11-30-2008, 12:33 AM | #76 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Queen were somewhat of a cross between pop, glam and prog. But overall I wouldn't call them a prog band, even though they obviously had prog influences.
|
11-30-2008, 03:28 AM | #77 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
As Anteater mentioned, if you're gonna include prog influenced, then why stop at Queen?
Nektar would've fit right in here, though.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
11-30-2008, 04:02 AM | #78 (permalink) | ||
I'm sorry, is this Can?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,989
|
Thing is boo boo wishes he hadn't included Queen, and considering how old the thread is, it's certainly forgivable.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
11-30-2008, 10:34 PM | #80 (permalink) | |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
__________________
first.am |
|
|