|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-07-2013, 12:29 PM | #41 (permalink) | |||
Master, We Perish
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
|
Quote:
Quote:
If you feel so entitled to snark, why don't you actually bring some ideas to the table.
__________________
Quote:
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits Spoiler for guess what:
|
|||
09-07-2013, 04:21 PM | #43 (permalink) | |
Master, We Perish
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
|
Yes, more than them probably. What on Shields can you point directly back to in terms of influence? Besides, this isn't just about Grizzly Bear.
Who exactly do you think is so much more qualified? It's just a little annoying to have some one off to the side criticizing ideas with absolutely none to contribute.
__________________
Quote:
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits Spoiler for guess what:
|
|
09-08-2013, 06:41 PM | #44 (permalink) |
AllTheWhileYouChargeAFee
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,178
|
Speaking of Grizzly Bear, after listening to their albums on the internet the past week, I bought each of their last 3 albums (I'm one of those people who actually buy the CD's) this weekend. I even picked up Shields. When I bought Veckatimest yesterday and listened to it a few more times, it had a better impression on me than it initially did, so I decided to grab Shields today as well, wondering if it would grow on me as well. After a couple more listens I do like it better than I originally did, though I still think Yellow House > Veckatimest > Shields.
Anyway, last night I discovered no one's started a dedicated Grizzly Bear thread on this forum, so I'm about to start one myself in the "Indie/Alternative" section.
__________________
Stop and find a pretty shell for her Beach Boys vs Beatles comparisons begin here |
09-08-2013, 09:23 PM | #45 (permalink) | |
Master, We Perish
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
|
I still get vinyl for especially good albums so
But to anyone else out there I wasn't kidding about if you had someone else you think is better, I'm not trying to promote only indie bands as innovative, they're just who came to mind.
__________________
Quote:
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits Spoiler for guess what:
|
|
09-08-2013, 10:18 PM | #46 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: livin wild
Posts: 2,179
|
Quote:
It just seems weird to say Rihanna isnt as innovative because of 90s electronic music when Grizzly Bear arent the first in their respective field either, whether it be indie in general or psychedelic pop. Ive always got a Beach Boys or Kinks vibe from them, but theyre also taking advantage of this lush indie sound thats become pretty popular lately (ala Beach House, the xx, Tame Impala, etc). But like I said, I might just not get what being innovative even means so who knows. |
|
09-09-2013, 12:31 AM | #47 (permalink) |
AllTheWhileYouChargeAFee
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,178
|
I don't think there's actually much you can do these days that is *truly* innovative. After all, even the "innovative" music of the 1966-67 Beatles got some of their ideas from Indian classical music (which had been around for hundreds of years), as well as avant-garde classical music such as Stockhausen, which had been around since at least the 50's, and some as far back as the 20's.
So when I think someone says "innovative" they probably really mean "out of the ordinary" even if it's something that's been done before.
__________________
Stop and find a pretty shell for her Beach Boys vs Beatles comparisons begin here |
09-09-2013, 12:39 AM | #48 (permalink) |
AllTheWhileYouChargeAFee
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,178
|
From the mid-1920's.
Hell, even Animal Collective isn't this weird.
__________________
Stop and find a pretty shell for her Beach Boys vs Beatles comparisons begin here |
09-09-2013, 02:43 AM | #49 (permalink) | |||
Master, We Perish
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
|
Quote:
Pertaining to the Rihanna comparison, she as well as Gaga do a good job to revitalize electro types of music in pop, but it's more like taking this part of the sound and having them sing on it, whereas Grizzly Bear are blending different styles and creating something a little more distinct with it (of course, that's just how i see it, i'm pretty lousy with a lot of new music though so i may be all kinds of wrong). Radiohead, a band hailed for its innovation, are also masters of concocting entirely unique music out of a sum of their influences, and freely admit it. Quote:
Brian Wilson, whose songwriting innovation with the Beach Boys that influenced even Paul McCartney, laced his particularly avant-pop-before-that-was-really-a-thing lost masterpiece SMiLE with references to his inspirations: 50s Doo Wop and Soul ("Gee," "I Wanna Be Around"); old timey folk tunes ("My Sunshine"); Ragtime ("Look"); even "Heroes and Villains" is rumored to be a melodic flip of his all time favorite classical piece, "Rhapsody in Blue," and if you listen closely to one moment in that piece you can make out where the vocal melody of the faster section (that begins the song) comes from. TL;DR truly there is no entirely original music, maybe occasionally there is something that shifts paradigms (The Beatles, the Beach Boys, electronic music) or challenges the audience (the Velvet Underground, Captain Beefheart (who can be traced back to caveman drawings of sex and mutilation as well as the blues)), or whatever else you may consider an innovation. But most of what it comes down to is what kind of twist they put on the sounds their engaging. Or to me, it seems that way; especially at this point in the game, where music technology hasn't really created anything new to work into songwriting.
__________________
Quote:
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits Spoiler for guess what:
|
|||
09-09-2013, 03:23 AM | #50 (permalink) | |||
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Quote:
Quote:
I just looked over the current top 40 here: Top 40 Chart for the week of September 07, 2013 - American Top 40 With Ryan Seacrest Nothing really stands out as innovative. Also as far as pop is concerned the genre just changes with time and adapts to current trends. Sure, there are a few artists on that list that tend to borrow from their influences that come from different decades but that's the state of music in general lately.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
|||
|