|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
AllTheWhileYouChargeAFee
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,188
|
![]()
@Surell,
Those are definitely interesting songs. That said, it's pretty much what I would expect of "progressive" pop/rock nowadays - lots of electronics, de-emphasis on melody. "Interesting," but not "beautiful" or what I would call "emotionally moving." I'd give them credit for technique/technical prowess, but lacking emotion/passion. I found myself listening to the 2nd song more intently. Hard to tell, but it sounded like some interesting time signature changes were going on - like, 3/8 with interruptions of ... something else. If pop music were to go in this direction, I would consider it a step in the right direction, but would still yearn for the 1960-1990 years.
__________________
Stop and find a pretty shell for her Beach Boys vs Beatles comparisons begin here |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
|
![]() Quote:
And nor should it be. If the current generation of kids were interested in listening to 40 year old country ballads I would be seriously worried about the future of music.
__________________
![]() Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|