Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Pop (https://www.musicbanter.com/pop/)
-   -   The Pop of Today Vs Pop Of Yesterday (https://www.musicbanter.com/pop/70178-pop-today-vs-pop-yesterday.html)

Zer0 01-19-2014 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jarlaxle (Post 1407816)
The most basic test for any act: can they pull off an acoustic live show? With most modern pop acts, the answer is a resounding "NO!"

Not all music styles are suited to acoustic live shows.

Surell 01-24-2014 05:28 PM

Yeah, eff that unplugged nonsense

neardeathexperience 01-26-2014 08:03 AM

The take your breath away factor has been lost on today's music. There is nothing out there that comes close to comparing with a young Chuck Berry, Elvis, or the Beatles for that matter. Video stations like Much Music and MTV have had to farm out most of their programming time because there is just not enough quality music being made to fill a 24 hour a day station.

Jarlaxle 01-26-2014 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zer0 (Post 1407822)
Not all music styles are suited to acoustic live shows.

And the vast majority that cannot do so, SUCK.

Ninetales 01-26-2014 05:36 PM

boy those kraftwerk guys suck do they even play autobahn in acoutic???

djchameleon 01-26-2014 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neardeathexperience (Post 1410308)
The take your breath away factor has been lost on today's music. There is nothing out there that comes close to comparing with a young Chuck Berry, Elvis, or the Beatles for that matter. Video stations like Much Music and MTV have had to farm out most of their programming time because there is just not enough quality music being made to fill a 24 hour a day station.

I get the topic of the thread is to compare. I don't understand why people always want to compare certain artists and make it seem like there needs to be a similar version of the same artist in today's music. MTV has about five different channels dedicated to playing strictly music and quality stuff to regardless of what you think. You have a prejudice against modern music so you don't put any effort into seeking out the quality artists odd today. The medium to find music has obviously changed and it just seems like you are relying on older mediums and that doesn't make sense.

Ninetales 01-26-2014 06:46 PM

imo music died in the 1890s when the teleharmonium was invented and ruined acoustics

Surell 01-27-2014 01:20 AM

^ this guy gets it

galt54 01-27-2014 01:54 AM

Here follows my idiosyncratic hypothesis concerning the cause of the poverty in pop music nowadays. This hypothesis is based on the essential point conveyed in Ayn Rand's essay "The Comprachicos" (this essay is pubished in the essay collection "Return of the Primitive", edited by Peter Schwartz).

My hyopothesis is that the root cause of the dearth of good new pop music in our time is progressive education.

Why?

In order to create good new music the songwriter needs to possess formidable cognitive skills. Modern education sabotages the development of said skills. Therefore there is a poverty of good minds out there nowadays. And so, just as young people today are less able to read, write, do arithmetic,and so forth compared to the kids of my generation (I was born in 1954), so also kids today are less able to carry out the thinking necessary to create good new music. The minds of the young have been disintegrated by the (mostly public) schools which they have been required to attend.

A tragedy.

Conclusions (two of them):

1) We need a philosophy of reason.

2) We need to get the government out of education (in other words: NO public schools! Privatize both the production and finance of education!)

Janszoon 01-27-2014 05:16 AM

A person named Galt talking about Ayn Rand? Shocking I tells ya.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.