|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-17-2013, 05:30 AM | #31 (permalink) | ||
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
Quote:
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
||
06-17-2013, 08:01 AM | #32 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 35
|
Pop music is, by definition, bland, repetitive, very basic lyrics set to a catchy dance beat. "Oooohh, babee.....' etc.
I'd say the main difference between Pop (or any other genre, for that matter) in the 1920's - 1970's and thereafter might be that in the 'Good Old Days' (......), it was MUCH more difficult for anyone to a) become a musician and b) get noticed beyond a small town/circle of friends. Today, we have several hundreds of Teach-Yourself paks most people - at least in the developed world - can afford, and we have You Tube...... We also have thousands of different items of electronic wizardry that can make any doofus with enough money to buy them or enough connections to borrow them sound like Spandau Ballet meets 50 Cen'. |
06-17-2013, 12:40 PM | #33 (permalink) | |||
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: livin wild
Posts: 2,179
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And connections? Um networking is how you get anywhere in any profession, how can you possibly think having connections is a bad thing? Justin Bieber started out with a guitar and a YouTube channel. He didn't just throw money at big wig execs until they gave him all the fame and power that his greedy fingers could hold. Is bieber great? Maybe. Maybe not. I'm not arguing that he's amazing but I'm arguing that people should be able to believe he is. Personally ill listen to Boyfriend if I want to get in the party mood much like the way ill listen to Harold Budd if I want to relax or Gorguts if I want to rip someone's head off. Hey some people like listening to chart pop. Why others constantly cry about this and then try to justify how all modern music is **** and that real music died in the 70s blah blah blah boo hoo is beyond me. Music, like everything, is constantly evolving. If you don't like Rihanna's music that's cool but don't patronize those that do just because you have extreme tunnel vision. But then again what do I even know I'm just a god damn pokemon |
|||
06-17-2013, 01:38 PM | #34 (permalink) | ||
Master, We Perish
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
|
Quote:
is four years recent enough? I've got one from last year:
__________________
Quote:
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits Spoiler for guess what:
|
||
06-17-2013, 06:04 PM | #35 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: New York x Los Angeles
Posts: 22
|
everyone loves to reminisce about the golden years, but they had their fair share of bad music. have to take the good and the bad , some of the most remembered tracks weren't nearly as big as when they were released. Every generation had their 'soulja boy'
__________________
[Link removed by mod, put it back in again and you're gone] |
06-17-2013, 08:01 PM | #36 (permalink) |
AllTheWhileYouChargeAFee
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,178
|
@Surell,
Those are definitely interesting songs. That said, it's pretty much what I would expect of "progressive" pop/rock nowadays - lots of electronics, de-emphasis on melody. "Interesting," but not "beautiful" or what I would call "emotionally moving." I'd give them credit for technique/technical prowess, but lacking emotion/passion. I found myself listening to the 2nd song more intently. Hard to tell, but it sounded like some interesting time signature changes were going on - like, 3/8 with interruptions of ... something else. If pop music were to go in this direction, I would consider it a step in the right direction, but would still yearn for the 1960-1990 years.
__________________
Stop and find a pretty shell for her Beach Boys vs Beatles comparisons begin here |
06-17-2013, 08:39 PM | #37 (permalink) | |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
Quote:
And nor should it be. If the current generation of kids were interested in listening to 40 year old country ballads I would be seriously worried about the future of music.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
|
06-17-2013, 08:45 PM | #38 (permalink) |
AllTheWhileYouChargeAFee
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,178
|
Perhaps I should have said, "I would still prefer the 1960-1990 years."
As an aside, I'm surprised at how many teenagers and 20-something I encounter not only like, but prefer that 40-year-old music. When I was a teenager it was almost unheard of to prefer 40-year-old music. The fact that so many young people these days like this stuff, is one more reason why I suspect there really is something to the notion that popular music then had something today's music lacks.
__________________
Stop and find a pretty shell for her Beach Boys vs Beatles comparisons begin here |
06-17-2013, 08:50 PM | #39 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
I remember people saying the exact same thing in the 80s and in the 90s.
It's not unusual at all. When you first start to look at music past what's in the charts the big names from the past are nearly always your first reference to non chart music. Some people stick with that, others decide that they don't want to listen to old music all the time and then go out & find music that appeals to them that's being made today.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
06-17-2013, 11:13 PM | #40 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: indoors
Posts: 722
|
None of these points are new to me, and all have some validity.
Here's my position: there was always low-quality pop, but great stuff (mostly with regard to lyrics) rarely is made anymore. There has been a noted decline in the percentage of ballads among hit songs in the past decade or so (compare Katy Perry and Lady Gaga with Madonna), and ballads in my opinion comprise most of the great pop songs of all time. The loss of great pop includes reasons mentioned by others, along with the MTV-fueled increase emphasis on appearance, (research-demonstrated) greater narcissism among today's young people (I mean fans and musicians, with less of an ability to go emotionally deep), the replacement of rock with rap on major stations and channels, more emphasis on the not-very-fluent-in-English part of the international market (which almost automatically limits lyrical complexity), and the decline of quality musicians among male pop stars. I'm not going to open one can of worms from that list. Instead I will expand on the male thing with the risqué point that men generally write better love songs than women do, probably because men 'need' women more than women 'need' men and male pop artists have trouble getting fan loyalty without strong ballads - but the industry has shifted toward the other way male artists can get loyalty (albeit not as much as female pop stars can), which is through widespread sex appeal. I am oversimplifying things, because it's a complicated subject and I don't have enough free time.
__________________
If you have ideas or feedback for the site, visit The Musicbanter Improvement Thread. |
|