|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-28-2011, 10:01 PM | #43 (permalink) |
Divination
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
|
John Lennon
Paul McCartney is one of the kings of pop (if so inclined) but John Lennon is an Icon. Lennon could claim status as The King of Rock & Roll in my opinion. He was the main lead vocal, front man and songwriter of the Beatles, and all of his solo material is a must own, especially by a music enthusiast. As well as McCartney's, George Harrison, and Ringo Star's solo work. Harrison is considered one of the best/influential guitarist of all-time and some of his (Harrison) solo work is outstanding . But I think John Lennon is on a level above them all as an artist, activist, personal life, whatever? His single Imagine resonates so loud while the song musically is simple and easy to play.
|
06-29-2011, 04:22 PM | #44 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
|
Early on more so, later on McCartney played really quite a big role. He took charge of later albums like Sgt Pepper and Abbey Road. The later Beatles would not have been the same without McCartney.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on |
06-29-2011, 06:02 PM | #45 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 264
|
Yeah I agree The Beatles were a product of the song writing merits of both Lennon and McCartney. To try and attribute more or less of the praise on either kind of misses the point as I think it was the dynamic between them that let them create what they did. Although I do consider McCartney the poppier and Lennon somehow more substantial but as a team they were probably the greatest song writing team ever.
__________________
Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight, And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way, Do not go gentle into that good night. |
07-01-2011, 06:41 PM | #46 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: The Wasteland
Posts: 77
|
I`ve always been a Beatles fan-saw McCartney live last summer.
He has really embraced his legacy-I would estimate that about 70% of his material was Beatles songs.He sang "Something" as a tribute to George and "A day in the life" for John. If you include material like "All my loving", "Hey Jude", "Get Back", "And I love her" and "Here, There and Everywhere", then who can top him? |
07-01-2011, 08:05 PM | #47 (permalink) | |
Live by the Sword
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
|
Quote:
|
|
07-01-2011, 08:14 PM | #48 (permalink) |
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
|
For a so called King Of Pop I would expect to like at least a couple of songs he's done in his 50 plus year career but I don't.
I can't stand anything this man has ever put out, even the small handful of Beatles tunes I do like seem to be predominately perfomed by Lennon. And yet I have nothing against the man whatsoever. This isn't like a Bono thing or a Matt Bellemy thing where I want to kill them on sight. I have nothing against the guy. I just don't like anything he's performed.
__________________
Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
07-03-2011, 01:40 PM | #50 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 264
|
Quote:
__________________
Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight, And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way, Do not go gentle into that good night. |
|
|