|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-13-2011, 01:13 AM | #151 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
|
People mishear lyrics anyway and just remember bits of them more just because they are connected to the best hooks, normally in the chorus. And people hum melodies a lot too if they don't remember the lyrics.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on |
01-14-2012, 04:27 PM | #154 (permalink) |
Mwana Nzala
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Shakopee, Minnesota
Posts: 627
|
Paul MacCartney is a pioneer of music. He is someone who made some great valuable songs. He is someone who is a genius but he is not a king of pop. I can assure you that. Michael Jackson was a great dancer and singer but Paul has a great voice. Paul has had been able to maintain a good responsible career. I enjoy Paul. But Paul is not the king of pop at all.
__________________
The problem with Franco Pepe Kalle is that he is a unpredictable character. There is surprising info about this man. You think he only likes Franco and Pepe Kalle but when you find out that he hears other artists, you are shock. Girls are the sexy thing that God created. Important to notice FPK. |
01-14-2012, 06:13 PM | #155 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 937
|
Don't worry about the thread title, it was just a way to question why people always call Michael Jackson the King of Pop. I think people define pop way too narrowly nowadays anyway.
__________________
non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on Last edited by starrynight; 01-14-2012 at 07:28 PM. |
10-06-2021, 04:26 PM | #160 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: 32S 116E
Posts: 324
|
I have little interest in labels like "king of pop", which is just marketing hype. However, if it ever applied to McCartney, it certainly does not now. I stopped being interested in him after Venus and Mars.
If sales is the criterion, then Michael Jackson would claim the title. |
|