|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
|
![]()
Well ya, the BB were active many more years than The Beatles. You can't guarantee that the Beatles would have kept their streak going in the seventies, but I believe they would have. The Beatles seemed to be getting better and better, unlike the Beach Boys. Lennon and McCartney had huge success after the break up. As you mentioned, Paul and wings were big. And Lennons Imagine went number 1 worldwide.
As I listen to The Beach Boys, I can't help but notice that they weren't as diverse as The Beatles. I don't think they were as musically inclined either, except for their vocal harmonies. So many BB songs start sounding the same to me. The same can be said for earlier Beatles albums, but Beatles were always evolving and getting better. There's just so much More life and energy in Sgt peppers compared to pet sounds. Pet Sounds is a bore of an album. Not a distinct difference between any of the songs. It's just like one long, boring song. With a few good moments. Quote:
Last edited by blastingas10; 01-08-2012 at 11:50 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|