The Beatles vs The Beach Boys - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Pop
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-08-2012, 10:23 PM   #261 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce View Post
yes

how many "baroque pop" bands now can you count on your fingers?
Both the Beach Boys and the Beatles are considered Baroque pop. What's your point?
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 10:33 PM   #262 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Beatles did more than "baroque pop" - they had psychedelia, rock, hard rock, showtunes, ballads

whilst Beach Boys were only reknown for that "chamber orchestra pop" on PS, sure they did other stuff, but none of it was that influential nor anything new
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 10:47 PM   #263 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce View Post
Beatles did more than "baroque pop" - they had psychedelia, rock, hard rock, showtunes, ballads

whilst Beach Boys were only reknown for that "chamber orchestra pop" on PS, sure they did other stuff, but none of it was that influential nor anything new
I would say the Beach Boys are actually more famous for their earlier music, which really (stuff like "I Get Around", "Little Deuce Coupe", etc.) isn't in the same style as Pet Sounds at all.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 11:53 PM   #264 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
blastingas10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
Default

The Beatles never seemed to falter like The Beach Boys did. The Beach Boys went through several periods of time without even having a hit. The Beatles never did that, the Beatles were constantly touring or recording music and always had a hit song playing.
blastingas10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 12:09 AM   #265 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

on an album to album basis, the number of albums the Beatles had were far less than the Beach Boys

if you compare the popular period of BB to the entire discography of Beatles, the hits were about the same

BB only never had any hits from the "slump" albums - that doesn't mean they're bad, however, it just means the public have already moved on to stuff like Led Zeppellin

nobody could have guaranteed that the Beatles would have any more hits had they stayed together in the 70s

Paul McCartney & Wings had quite a streak in the 70s but they weren't the Beatles
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 12:18 AM   #266 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomClancy11 View Post
Some people think The Sex Pistols are the greatest band ever. Opinions can be wrong
The problem with people who are of the opinion that the The Sex Pistols are the greatest band ever is that they don't consider that the Rezillos were.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 12:30 AM   #267 (permalink)
Master, We Perish
 
Surell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastingas10 View Post
Don't really understand this logic. You say they influenced most bands today but then somehow discredit that, like it's not a huge accomplishment.
Sure it is, but if their music isn't as good they don't deserve all the credit they get, ie. greatest band of All Time.

Quote:
They deserve credit for what they did in their own time. Nobody can make music forever, therefore nobody can always keep up with the times.
Then it isn't timeless; if it were, it would hold up.

Quote:
So, discrediting what they did because it was only in their time is flat out illogical and ignorant.
No, it's discrediting their timelessness.

Quote:
The Beatles continue to sell albums, more albums than the Beach Boys I'm sure.
Who cares? There are free mixtapes in the hip hop world of higher caliber than big budget, platinum selling albums, sometimes by the same artist. I'm sure Trout Mask Replica didn't sell near as well as any Beatles album, but it has more meaningful influence and timelessness than the Beatles.

Quote:
They continue to inspire generation after generation. Their music is still more creative and better than most bands today, bands who had the advantage of coming after and learning from the revolutionary bands like The Beatles and The Beach Boys and Pink Floyd and so on.
I wouldn't say more creative than today's best bands. Take Radiohead; they took influence from the Beatles, but it's not very noticeable, more dilute in their sound.

Il Duce, Baroque Pop may not be an extremely expansive genre, but elements of its style can be found in various artists, such as Fleet Foxes, Animal Collective, Radiohead, and the Beatles ( ). Besides, Brian Wilson's songwriting is just fantastic, proving how intricate a pop song (or really any song) can be: on the level of timeless classical composition. That display of excruciating perfectionism itself has inspired a number of artists as well.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhateverDude View Post
Laser beams, psychedelic hats, and for some reason kittens. Surrel reminds me of kittens.
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits
Spoiler for guess what:
|i am a heron i ahev a long neck and i pick fish out of the water w/ my beak if you dont repost this comment on 10 other pages i will fly into your kitchen tonight and make a mess of your pots and pans
Surell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 12:37 AM   #268 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
blastingas10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
Default

Well ya, the BB were active many more years than The Beatles. You can't guarantee that the Beatles would have kept their streak going in the seventies, but I believe they would have. The Beatles seemed to be getting better and better, unlike the Beach Boys. Lennon and McCartney had huge success after the break up. As you mentioned, Paul and wings were big. And Lennons Imagine went number 1 worldwide.

As I listen to The Beach Boys, I can't help but notice that they weren't as diverse as The Beatles. I don't think they were as musically inclined either, except for their vocal harmonies. So many BB songs start sounding the same to me. The same can be said for earlier Beatles albums, but Beatles were always evolving and getting better.

There's just so much More life and energy in Sgt peppers compared to pet sounds. Pet Sounds is a bore of an album. Not a distinct difference between any of the songs. It's just like one long, boring song. With a few good moments.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surell View Post
Sure it is, but if their music isn't as good they don't deserve all the credit they get, ie. greatest band of All Time.


Then it isn't timeless; if it were, it would hold up.


No, it's discrediting their timelessness.


Who cares? There are free mixtapes in the hip hop world of higher caliber than big budget, platinum selling albums, sometimes by the same artist. I'm sure Trout Mask Replica didn't sell near as well as any Beatles album, but it has more meaningful influence and timelessness than the Beatles.


I wouldn't say more creative than today's best bands. Take Radiohead; they took influence from the Beatles, but it's not very noticeable, more dilute in their sound.

Il Duce, Baroque Pop may not be an extremely expansive genre, but elements of its style can be found in various artists, such as Fleet Foxes, Animal Collective, Radiohead, and the Beatles ( ). Besides, Brian Wilson's songwriting is just fantastic, proving how intricate a pop song (or really any song) can be: on the level of timeless classical composition. That display of excruciating perfectionism itself has inspired a number of artists as well.
I don't think they're the best band ever but their music is timeless. Who cares that they still sell a lot of albums? Nobody I guess, but a lot of people still care about their albums. Their music clearly is still "holding up", a lot better than that of the Beach Boys. The Beatles are clearly the more timeless of the two.

Last edited by blastingas10; 01-09-2012 at 12:50 AM.
blastingas10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 12:50 AM   #269 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surell View Post
Il Duce, Baroque Pop may not be an extremely expansive genre, but elements of its style can be found in various artists, such as Fleet Foxes, Animal Collective, Radiohead, and the Beatles ( ). Besides, Brian Wilson's songwriting is just fantastic, proving how intricate a pop song (or really any song) can be: on the level of timeless classical composition. That display of excruciating perfectionism itself has inspired a number of artists as well.
yeah I know, but do those bands sound much like Pet Sounds? I think not, whereas bands influenced by the Beatles sound a lot like them

only bands that have the Pet Sounds sound (pardon the pun) are The High Llamas, the Wondermints and maybe Jellyfish

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastingas10 View Post
Well ya, the BB were active many more years than The Beatles. You can't guarantee that the Beatles would have kept their streak going in the seventies, but I believe they would have. The Beatles seemed to be getting better and better, unlike the Beach Boys. Lennon and McCartney had huge success after the break up. As you mentioned, Paul and wings were big. And Lennons Imagine went number 1 worldwide.
what's the basis of your belief? the Beatles would sooner or later fallen out of favour - look at the Rolling Stones - how many hits did they have outside of the 60s and early 70s?

if you compare hits, actually the Beach Boys had about 40 hit singles during their heyday, while the Beatles had only slightly over 30

Quote:
Originally Posted by blastingas10 View Post
As I listen to The Beach Boys, I can't help but notice that they weren't as diverse as The Beatles. I don't think they were as musically inclined either, except for their vocal harmonies. So many BB songs start sounding the same to me. The same can be said for earlier Beatles albums, but Beatles were always evolving and getting better.
that's cos you're hearing the wrong albums, as i suggested - listen to Sunflower, Friends, Wild Honey, 20/20, Surf's Up, Holland and Carl & The Passions - So Tough

or even Beach Boys Love You - if you're so inclined

the albums before Pet Sounds all sound mostly the same

not musically inclined? all members of the Beach Boys can play their instruments very well, except Brian who was a lousy bassist (he was great on the piano, though) Brian only engaged session musicians for Pet Sounds cos those were weird instruments
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 12:55 AM   #270 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
blastingas10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
Default

I'd say the most exciting moment on pet sounds is the title track. And "hang on to your ego".

The basis for that belief would be that the beatles were so consistent their entire career and even after they broke up paul and John had a lot of success. But ya, they wouldn't have kept it going forever. I don't think anyone could do that.

I listened to some of those albums. I'll keep listening.

The title track on Wild Honey is pretty good, other than that nothing really stands out to me. Currently listening to 20/20

Last edited by blastingas10; 01-09-2012 at 01:40 AM.
blastingas10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.