|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-08-2012, 10:33 PM | #262 (permalink) |
Live by the Sword
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
|
Beatles did more than "baroque pop" - they had psychedelia, rock, hard rock, showtunes, ballads
whilst Beach Boys were only reknown for that "chamber orchestra pop" on PS, sure they did other stuff, but none of it was that influential nor anything new |
01-08-2012, 10:47 PM | #263 (permalink) |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
I would say the Beach Boys are actually more famous for their earlier music, which really (stuff like "I Get Around", "Little Deuce Coupe", etc.) isn't in the same style as Pet Sounds at all.
|
01-08-2012, 11:53 PM | #264 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
|
The Beatles never seemed to falter like The Beach Boys did. The Beach Boys went through several periods of time without even having a hit. The Beatles never did that, the Beatles were constantly touring or recording music and always had a hit song playing.
|
01-09-2012, 12:09 AM | #265 (permalink) |
Live by the Sword
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
|
on an album to album basis, the number of albums the Beatles had were far less than the Beach Boys
if you compare the popular period of BB to the entire discography of Beatles, the hits were about the same BB only never had any hits from the "slump" albums - that doesn't mean they're bad, however, it just means the public have already moved on to stuff like Led Zeppellin nobody could have guaranteed that the Beatles would have any more hits had they stayed together in the 70s Paul McCartney & Wings had quite a streak in the 70s but they weren't the Beatles |
01-09-2012, 12:18 AM | #266 (permalink) | |
carpe musicam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
|
The problem with people who are of the opinion that the The Sex Pistols are the greatest band ever is that they don't consider that the Rezillos were.
__________________
Quote:
"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº? “I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac. “If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle. "If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon "I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards |
|
01-09-2012, 12:30 AM | #267 (permalink) | ||||||
Master, We Perish
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Havin a good time, rollin to the bottom.
Posts: 3,710
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Il Duce, Baroque Pop may not be an extremely expansive genre, but elements of its style can be found in various artists, such as Fleet Foxes, Animal Collective, Radiohead, and the Beatles ( ). Besides, Brian Wilson's songwriting is just fantastic, proving how intricate a pop song (or really any song) can be: on the level of timeless classical composition. That display of excruciating perfectionism itself has inspired a number of artists as well.
__________________
Quote:
^if you wanna know perfection that's it, you dumb shits Spoiler for guess what:
|
||||||
01-09-2012, 12:37 AM | #268 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
|
Well ya, the BB were active many more years than The Beatles. You can't guarantee that the Beatles would have kept their streak going in the seventies, but I believe they would have. The Beatles seemed to be getting better and better, unlike the Beach Boys. Lennon and McCartney had huge success after the break up. As you mentioned, Paul and wings were big. And Lennons Imagine went number 1 worldwide.
As I listen to The Beach Boys, I can't help but notice that they weren't as diverse as The Beatles. I don't think they were as musically inclined either, except for their vocal harmonies. So many BB songs start sounding the same to me. The same can be said for earlier Beatles albums, but Beatles were always evolving and getting better. There's just so much More life and energy in Sgt peppers compared to pet sounds. Pet Sounds is a bore of an album. Not a distinct difference between any of the songs. It's just like one long, boring song. With a few good moments. Quote:
Last edited by blastingas10; 01-09-2012 at 12:50 AM. |
|
01-09-2012, 12:50 AM | #269 (permalink) | |||
Live by the Sword
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
|
Quote:
only bands that have the Pet Sounds sound (pardon the pun) are The High Llamas, the Wondermints and maybe Jellyfish Quote:
if you compare hits, actually the Beach Boys had about 40 hit singles during their heyday, while the Beatles had only slightly over 30 Quote:
or even Beach Boys Love You - if you're so inclined the albums before Pet Sounds all sound mostly the same not musically inclined? all members of the Beach Boys can play their instruments very well, except Brian who was a lousy bassist (he was great on the piano, though) Brian only engaged session musicians for Pet Sounds cos those were weird instruments |
|||
01-09-2012, 12:55 AM | #270 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,126
|
I'd say the most exciting moment on pet sounds is the title track. And "hang on to your ego".
The basis for that belief would be that the beatles were so consistent their entire career and even after they broke up paul and John had a lot of success. But ya, they wouldn't have kept it going forever. I don't think anyone could do that. I listened to some of those albums. I'll keep listening. The title track on Wild Honey is pretty good, other than that nothing really stands out to me. Currently listening to 20/20 Last edited by blastingas10; 01-09-2012 at 01:40 AM. |
|