Michael Jackson - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Pop
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-18-2011, 08:21 AM   #11 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
chipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: LA, Ca
Posts: 179
Default

i think it is unfair to compare the two with each other. they came from two different generations and that in itself sets the demarcation line. both are great artists and both contributed to greatly to music.

The Beatles [and Elvis] certainly contributed to the acceptance of artists writing their own material to the mainstream. Before them, singers were manufactured by labels. They were fed the music they were going to sing and the image they were going to portray. The Beatles [and Elvis] broke that boundary. They were highly experimental in their music and introduced a lot of the styles that became the basis of the many progression in music today.

Michael Jackson is one of the performers who reaped from that but he definitely progressed it. In fact, he is the most successful in progressin his music. He was a multi genre artist, something that was uncommon in his era. He popularized the use of naratives in songs. He put MTV in mainstream. He bridged disco and hiphop. The list could go on.

You just can't compare.

I'd say Michael Jackson is up there with The Beatles and Elvis on my Level 1 Greatest Artist list.
__________________

real love letters to exes
chipper is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.