Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Pop (https://www.musicbanter.com/pop/)
-   -   Michael Jackson (https://www.musicbanter.com/pop/4378-michael-jackson.html)

FETCHER. 02-13-2012 11:24 PM

Regular people aren't interested in synths?

Howard the Duck 02-13-2012 11:33 PM

not from 50 years ago, I don't think so

i was talking about the future

FETCHER. 02-13-2012 11:35 PM

So why would regular people in 50yrs time be suddenly interested in synths? I just don't get it :(.

Howard the Duck 02-13-2012 11:47 PM

i mean in retrospect - Jacko's stuff from Bad onwards will sound very dated

The Beatles will still sound timeless as their stuff are mostly analogue

FETCHER. 02-13-2012 11:54 PM

I do get what you mean with The Beatles timeless sound, they are and I don't doubt that they were better musicians but Michael Jackson was not nicknamed the King of Pop for no reason, the man was a phenomenon. In 50 yrs time I'll be 70 and playing my beats to my children and grandchildren (if I can ever bear the little bastards :D) and hopefully they do the same with theirs. I know I've picked up some artists from my papas day.

Howard the Duck 02-14-2012 12:22 AM

i draw an analogy between Stevie Wonder's Innervisions and Sly & The Family Stone's There's a Riot oin' On

the former is trapped by the technology

the latter sounds very fresh even now, once it's remastered

Soulflower 02-14-2012 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Howard the Duck (Post 1154261)
no thx, gimme Terence Trent D'Arby any day

His a great artist as well.. thats your opinion if you prefer him but that takes nothing away from Mr. Jackson.

Howard the Duck 02-14-2012 01:43 AM

i meant Terence could do better what Jacko can do

FETCHER. 02-14-2012 01:47 AM

Yes, in your opinion as realtalk stated.

michelle118 04-21-2012 10:53 AM

Love MJ, I think the title of "king of pop" is definitely deserved!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.