Michael Jackson

~~The Virgin~~ · 06-20-2011, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aurora

It's inevitable that once an artist that big dies he becomes more popular. It always happens.

not really. mj was as popular when he was alive as when he is dead.

~~Soulflower~~ · 06-20-2011, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starrynight

I never said they were not acclaimed, I said they were not AS acclaimed. You seem to have trouble understanding what people say.
Jackson sold some of the publishing rights to Sony, he owned only about 50% at his death. He never got royalties for the songs, they still went to The Beatles, and he never owned the recordings. The fact that he invested in The Beatles showed that he recognised their major long term importance in that he thought it would be a good investment.

Answers.com - Who owns the Beatles' music

Thats a false statement and you need to stop getting your lies from wikipedia

chipper · 06-21-2011, 05:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by realtalk92

Thats a false statement and you need to stop getting your lies from wikipedia

that's also what i know... that he sold some of it (if not all of it). would be happy if you could enlighten me though. i like understanding the business side of music.

~~Soulflower~~ · 06-21-2011, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chipper

that's also what i know... that he sold some of it (if not all of it). would be happy if you could enlighten me though. i like understanding the business side of music.

Michael still owns the catalogue there is OTHER music included in the Sony ATV music catalogue besides the Beatles. Michael has alot of assets. What you are probably misunderstanding is his 1995 merging of Sony publishing with ATV music together by making them partner owner. He sold some of it to Japenese corporation Sony for 90 million dollars in 95 and it became the 2nd biggest music publishing company

Just to be clear Michael purchased ATV music/ Beatles Catalogue back in 1985.

The Japanese Sony sought to start a core business of diversity into music, films and games. Looking for further opportunities, the company aimed to expand its music publishing interests and looked towards Michael. The Japanese corporation offered Jackson $90 million for 50% of ATV Music in 1995. In that 50% The Beatles music as well as other artists and other things was included in that portion. Michael generated a cash cow of money with this catalogue and will continue in the future. Michaels portion of the catalogue is set to be worth between 450 -600 million dollars. The entire catalogue is set to be worth 1 billion to 4 billion dollars.

Michaels other publishing firm, Mijac, which publishes songs written by Michael himself and which is administered by competitor Warner/Chappell Music, is valued to be worth at least 400 million and is probably worth a whole lot more now since his passing.

chipper · 06-21-2011, 08:39 PM

ok... thank you

i'll probably research on this myself when i have the time and ask some people.

Necromancer · 06-22-2011, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starrynight

I never said they were not acclaimed, I said they were not AS acclaimed. You seem to have trouble understanding what people say.

Jackson sold some of the publishing rights to Sony, he owned only about 50% at his death. He never got royalties for the songs, they still went to The Beatles, and he never owned the recordings. The fact that he invested in The Beatles showed that he recognised their major long term importance in that he thought it would be a good investment.

Answers.com - Who owns the Beatles' music

Jackson didnt buy the Beatles copyrights because he thought it was a good investament, but simply because he could, and he wanted it no matter what it cost. (Simply just because he did). MJ was notoriously known to spend money wildly and without thought.

starrynight · 06-23-2011, 06:07 AM

I read somewhere that McCartney had advised him to invest in music publishing, and he was then dismayed when Jackson outbid him for the publishing rights to songs of The Beatles. Of course that might not be true, but then again it might be.

~~Soulflower~~ · 06-23-2011, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by starrynight

I read somewhere that McCartney had advised him to invest in music publishing, and he was then dismayed when Jackson outbid him for the publishing rights to songs of The Beatles. Of course that might not be true, but then again it might be.

You are right for a change.

Mcartney was exactly the first person to discuss publishing rights with Michael and educated him on it. In that conversation he told him he was going to buy his music. Michael thought it would be a good investment

~~Soulflower~~ · 06-23-2011, 09:34 AM

~~whitemore55~~ · 06-23-2011, 10:51 AM

Jackson is a real superstar. His song and dance is really great. I love jackson's music. He performed really well, so people cannot forget him.

06-21-2011, 08:39 PM	#1225 (permalink)
chipper Music Addict Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: LA, Ca Posts: 179	ok... thank you i'll probably research on this myself when i have the time and ask some people. __________________ real love letters to exes

06-23-2011, 06:07 AM	#1227 (permalink)
starrynight Music Addict Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 937	I read somewhere that McCartney had advised him to invest in music publishing, and he was then dismayed when Jackson outbid him for the publishing rights to songs of The Beatles. Of course that might not be true, but then again it might be. __________________ non-cliquey member of every music forum I participate on

06-23-2011, 09:34 AM	#1229 (permalink)
~~Soulflower~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 2,304

06-23-2011, 10:51 AM	#1230 (permalink)
~~whitemore55~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 3	Jackson is a real superstar. His song and dance is really great. I love jackson's music. He performed really well, so people cannot forget him.