|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#61 (permalink) | |||
Da Hiphopopotamus
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ehhhh you do know this is an old photo right?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 (permalink) | ||
Da Hiphopopotamus
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
|
![]()
How can you be so sure?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 (permalink) | ||
Da Hiphopopotamus
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
|
![]()
It doesn't look like it was shot for an album cover more like a regular photo shoot, for a magazine or something
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 (permalink) |
isfckingdead
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
|
![]()
Morrissey was pretty much out of the public eye during those years. Besides magazine photos are for magazines not singles. This is ridiculous I really don't care when the photo was taken enough to keep debating this.
|
![]() |
![]() |