|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: What do you think of The King Of Limbs? | |||
Brilliant | 36 | 21.43% | |
Good | 69 | 41.07% | |
Average | 30 | 17.86% | |
OK | 12 | 7.14% | |
Poor | 12 | 7.14% | |
Terrible | 9 | 5.36% | |
Voters: 168. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-25-2011, 06:25 PM | #82 (permalink) |
we are stardust
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
|
I voted 'poor' and I love Radiohead. I just don't enjoy this album. I love Lotus Flower but everything else is just... boring. Personal opinion. I don't know, maybe it will grow on me. I feel as though this album is less Radiohead and more Thom Yorke.
|
02-25-2011, 06:34 PM | #84 (permalink) |
we are stardust
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,894
|
^ Actually yes, when I first listened Codex did somewhat move me and I do like the song. But I don't want to undermine Radiohead's earlier stuff which I just absolutely love to bits... in comparison this album was a disappointment for me.
|
02-26-2011, 08:39 AM | #87 (permalink) | |
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
|
02-26-2011, 06:11 PM | #88 (permalink) |
Chocolate Homunculus
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,293
|
It certainly does have a "really different" feel from any other Radiohead album. They stick to the same sort of Radiohead-ish melodies, but the whole vibe I get from this album IS unique... and pretty boring.
|
02-26-2011, 10:56 PM | #89 (permalink) |
Let it drip
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,430
|
Having had a week to digest KOL, I'll say this: It certainly isnt boring. The interplay between rhythm and texture is facinating - there are so many layers to the songs that it really requires the listener's full attention to appreciate what they're actually listening to. I still think it's too early to regard it as a classic or whatnot, but it has grown on me. Although one thing I do think is that it sounds incomplete. I fully expect a part 2.
|
02-27-2011, 02:23 PM | #90 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,221
|
Quote:
In terms of classic status, the jury seems already to have come in with their verdict. This is already the worst-received Radiohead record in the critics community since Amnesiac. As for fans, they seem way more divided over this release than they were over In Rainbows, which was almost unanimously adored from the word go. It is my belief that the vast majority of albums are in future remembered according to how they were perceived upon initial release. This is not a Radiohead classic, and, not being a ground-breaking release by any sane standards, nor does it deserve to be so regarded. However... I personally really like this album. It is one of my favourite Radiohead releases. I think I can get more pleasure from listening to this album than to much of their other material. That is not because it is 'cutting edge' or anything else that it is clearly not. What makes me love this record is that it is more in tune with the general gist of current indie/alternative music than previous Radiohead releases have been. It reminds me of other music that I love, and hence, I love this record. Every song is great, and they all fit together in a way that also makes this album greater than the sum of its parts. That's enough of an achievement for me. Radiohead get my full marks here.... ....But, all the same, it is understandable that this will not be the general consensus. |
|
|