![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't know why you quoted the word, "reviews" -- I didn't spelt it wrong did I? |
I was trying to insinuate that I was finger quoting the world reviews, because they're not really reviews. I guess **** like that rarely comes across over the internet, though. My bad.
|
Quote:
|
I think the main problem we have with her is that it seems this began as supposedly a journal, she put very little work into her "reviews" (quotes definitely required) but THEN made a pretty long (in comparison) entry about God and her religion, which really then betrays her true intent, it would seem, in making this journal, which is to preach at us.
Nobody likes that, and that's not what the journal section is for. If she wants to argue for or against the existence or merits of God, any god, go to the Religious and Current Affairs subforum and set your pulpit up there. Nobody's going to want to read this journal to get your take on how wonderful God is, if she exists. That's what I got a problem with! What I think he meant to say was, that is a thing, with which he has a problem!--- Dr. Frasier Crane. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
It's a quote, dumbass! Frasier corrects a guy on his grammar (something like the guy says "My mom literally hangs around the house all day") and he says "Oh dear, I have a little problem with people who use words incorrectly. You see, she can't literally hang, unless she's a bat!" whereupon he says "You know what I got a problem with? High and mighty college boys who pick holes in my grammar! That's what I got a problem with!" To which Frasier then quotes that bit, making it obvious he's a) even more of a snob than the guy believes and b) wasn't really listening to him, despite being a shrink.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyway everyone except Ki (who acts like a Negative Nancy on daily basis) got me thinking 'is that her actual "review" or did she lift it from somewhereselse on the interwebz?' Anyhow that thought got my Spider senses tingleling and I thought I'll copy/paste a segment of her "review" and what I found out was that unless she is the original author of the Wikipedia entry for Dancing in the Moonlight, she flat out just copied and pasted her "reveiw" from Wikipedia. Which is a "no-no" according to forum rules, members can not pass other people stuff off as their own. I don't know if she did it deliberately, I mean she could been unaware of using quotes when she did that. But still, now that I know that I feel a bit let down by that "review," it seems like a total lack of effort on her part. :mad: Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.