Because you started it, you pea brain.

And both are **** that you only use when starting a political hack tirade.

What's the point in putting makeup on a troll?

All of those terms are mainstream political terms. You pretending like it's a 4 Chan thing is you being in denial as usual

So it's not a real thing?

Nah, I just wouldn't put it on one side or the other in this instance since I'd rather goof on both.

Outrage mob is good I guess, I don't really care.

I don't think I put it on a particular side

I noted through history it's changed where most of it comes from

It used to be most of it came from the Christian right. Now it's more likely to come from the woke left.

You put it on the PC crowd, which is a side :wavey:

"It" = reacting to the special in a way that warrants being goofed on btw

in any given fight, ya

But the PC crowd in Lenny Bruce's day had very different politics from the PC crowd of today, which I noted.

So I'm not saying it's a right or left thing by definition.

I mean you can manipulate the conversation all you want but I'm sure you're not totally ignorant about being a 4Chan tard and how "the left" and "PC" are used on the internet. You can refrain from using "snowflake" and "cuck" but they're kind of unspoken with you.

Not using them won't make what you say any different.

Sometimes I think you're arguing against headlines related to what we're talking about instead of what I'm actually saying.

I haven't been on 4 Chan since I was a teen

I think you project a lot of **** onto me tbh

Yeah the term snowflake I could see lining up with what I say to extent.. But I still don't say it cause it's corny. So you trying to flip it back on me is once again a fail.

As for cuck I just think it's meaningless.

Bottom line is you still profiled and missed the mark, just like I did.

when I responded to that post that part wasn't up, first of all

Second, I still don't see your point. "It" refers to the mob. That doesn't in any way mean I'm saying all mobs are politically aligned.

That's the "both sides" I was referring to in this culture war nonsense.

Chappelle 4 prez

.

I mean I'm sure that's true to an extent, but the same can be said of virtually any comedy with a message

E.g. Carlins fans just had an axe to grind against the FCC and profanity restrictions


And you're also ignoring fact that this is sorta response to the hate the last special got over jokes that were not designed to prod people for outrage

As Lewis Black once said, by all the rules of the Catholic Church, if you think it then you said it, *******.

I've addressed its reactionary nature many times.

i never thought it. It just sounds almost like something I would say. E.g. fragile souls

You suck at taking me to task tbh
I want Dr melphi

Why shouldn't you react to some **** telling you not to do something by doing it 5 more times?

Do whatever you want, but if you ain't got jokes I ain't gonna join in on your spite laugh.

Don't lie to the Pope. I've got dick scars to show you the way.

I don't know, because it could be harmful to someone even if it's not obvious?

it wasn't a spite laugh... But him going in like he did was saying **** you I'll do what I want..which was frankly both inspirational and funny.

All praise be to Chappelle the God

Everybody has a pet issue. If we steer clear of all of them then we're left with no more prolific, edgy comedy.

So **** it.

If I find a joke offensive it's just the way it goes. Can't please everyone.

Lol you live in a Twilight zone dude.

I wish.

The biggest "**** you I'll do what I want" would be doing the same thing you did before. You know, like not compromising on your humour in favour of looking like a bitter, tryhard troll who has his moments.

stop stealing all my insults you cuck



That's basically what he did, he just went a little harder.

You haven't even seen the OJ special, right? If you watch that and don't laugh at the bill Cosby bit then please never speak to me about comedy again.

Doesn't that make you the cuck?

Not yet. What's it called?

It's the 2017 special on Netflix. The age of spin

Been on a Ralphie Mae kick lately. RIP

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0pfZygi2t8

That's one hell of a closer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMJWeluZ3tI

Chappelle's special was honestly brilliant. The more times I watch it the more convinced I am.

The Prince lyrics in the beginning. The Anthony Bourdain joke. Segway into celebrity hunting season. Michael Jackson's victims got their dick sucked by the king of pop while "most if us just got awkward thanksgivings for the rest of our lives."

Then all the **** with the alphabet people, me too, abortions... Followed by school shootings and a paranoid Dave arming himself with guns to protect his home from "heroin addicted whites."

This completely blows a hole in the idea that he did something wrong by "punching down." None of publications that attacked him cared about him relentlessly mocking poverty stricken Midwestern white drug addicts.

Why is that? We're told punching down is based in power dynamics. Those without power are considered poor taste to attack.

Yet the heroin addicted whites he mocks have zero power. There was no backlash for a couple reasons.

1) they have no advocacy groups lobbying in favor of their public image. Women have NOW. The alphabet people have glaad. Jews have the adl. Blacks have the NAACP, Muslims have cair, etc. You will have to answer to any of these groups if you portray their constituency in a way they don't approve of.

2) Dave was brilliantly flipping the racial dynamics with his material on heroin addicted whites. In a number of ways.
a) the typical idea of a gun owner who is trying to protect his property is a suburban white man paranoid about black and Hispanic criminals pulling a home invasion. Dave paints the picture if an eccentric black millionaire in MAGA country scared of heroin addicted whites breaking in to rifle through his change jar.
b) he juxtaposed the modern "opioid crisis" with the crack epidemic of the 80's and 90's, and the way our society has addressed them... Concluding "whatever happened to JUST SAY NO? What's so hard about that??"

And so, the last portion if his special, despite being more hard hitting than any other portion, flew under the radar. Because his politics were correct. This theme is present throughout the special. Repeatedly, he either dave says something over the line and outlandish and then brings it back with something acceptable, or he does the reverse.

He's constantly treading a thin tight rope to stay barely in bounds yet allowing for a reasonable suspicion otherwise.

Ja being childishly vindictive in the face of barely any criticism sure is hilarious.

And damn that Louis video got taken down, bummer.

Better than Kramer though?

It wasn't vindictive really.

no comparison. Kramer leaped off the tight rope and did a nose dive into a crowd of wounded orphans.

So you don't know what vindictive means or?

Or I disagree with you?

Probably both. Seems like you view a lot of the vindictive elements as a positive based on your last post.

You're starting to bore me now

Maybe try explaining what you find so vindictive about it