|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Which Is Better? | |||
The Harry Potter Movies |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 24.07% |
The Lord of the Rings Movies |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
41 | 75.93% |
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Under A Violet Moon
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Winterfell
Posts: 65
|
![]()
Personally for me, Lord of the Rings wins hands down no contest (both the movies and the books). I still enjoy the Harry Potter movies (and books) though. Very much so. They just won't ever be up there with Tolkien for me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) |
( ̄ー ̄)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,270
|
![]()
I dunno, my opinion? I'm not a movie connoisseur, nor am I a book connoisseur, but in my opinion the HP series was far more enjoyable and memorable than the LOTR series.
Yes, I've read all of both series. But my opinion probably has to do with my age. I grew up following the story of Harry Potter, and it'll always be part of my childhood. LOTR was one of those stinky old books your dad read when he was a kid. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) |
Groupie
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9
|
![]()
Both really aren't that great writers if I'm going to be honest, at least in their fields, and if you compare their prose with other literary greats like Fitzgerald, Pynchon, Vonnegut and such they just don't stand up. Even against other speculative fiction greats like Mieville, Phillip K. D*ck and Lovecraft, they are lacking. Rowling wrote with the sophistication of a high-schooler and Tolkien's style doesn't lend well to conveying action, which is an essential thing in the epic fantasy field. However, you can't deny the scope of Tolkien's imagination and creativity and the joy of his description of the land itself. Few writers have such an appreciation of nature as he, I feel. Tolkien gets leeway since he essentially created fantasy and had nothing else to compare his work with except Homeric epics.
But anyway, LOTR was much better and the Harry Potter movies were bland to me. edit: I knew you would block out Mr. Phillip. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
thirsty ears
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Boulder
Posts: 742
|
![]()
i really cannot fathom how these two are even comparable. it's apples and oranges.
HP is fun. it's whimsical. it makes you feel good because everyone can relate to poor misunderstood harry and his new found fame. LOTR is entirely different. frodo isn't bubbling around an enchanted castle eating pumpkin pasties and battling a dark lord in his spare time. he is bearing an enormous physical and metaphorical token of evil. i know this thread is about the films, but you cannot divorce the pretty special effects from the underlying themes.
__________________
my flac collection |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|