Who's going to see Avatar?

michelle_elle · 12-28-2009, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NumberNineDream

The same stuff happened also with Ice Age 3-D, but I guess this time there's an extra reason: The 3D being actually good.

I hope you're right

Otherwise I'm gonna be real pissed off for spending that much time on the ticket hunt

I once saw a really bad 3D movie (on dinosaurs, for heaven's sake), in a bad theatre, with bad seats. I got dizzy and went outside. I hope it was because of bad 3d glasses, or I'll vomit all over avatar's front rows

NumberNineDream · 12-28-2009, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michelle_elle

I hope you're right

Otherwise I'm gonna be real pissed off for spending that much time on the ticket hunt

I once saw a really bad 3D movie (on dinosaurs, for heaven's sake), in a bad theatre, with bad seats. I got dizzy and went outside. I hope it was because of bad 3d glasses, or I'll vomit all over avatar's front rows

I think that would just make the movie more interesting for the others.
"Vomit!" I say.

michelle_elle · 12-28-2009, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NumberNineDream

I think that would just make the movie more interesting for the others.
"Vomit!" I say.

I almost peed my pants off!

I should vomit, ha? I can vomit... I WILL vomit!
Thanx!

FETCHER. · 12-28-2009, 06:27 PM

Didn't you mean boak Melissa?

~~bungalow~~ · 12-28-2009, 06:32 PM

The only reason to see this is the visuals. And that really isn't much of a reason.

NumberNineDream · 12-28-2009, 06:33 PM

FETCHER. · 12-29-2009, 10:29 AM

The graphics is the only thing everyone seems to be looking forward to, and not the story line etc.

NSW · 12-29-2009, 12:04 PM

Because the story line is simple, and it's been done before. But that's ok. To me it enhanced the rest of the movie, like the visuals and the acting. Simple story lines aren't always a bad thing.

FETCHER. · 12-29-2009, 12:05 PM

I guess you're right about simple story lines arn't necessarily a bad thing. I think I'm going to expect to little when I go to see it, that should make it better though, instead of being disapointed with it

!

~~bungalow~~ · 12-29-2009, 01:59 PM

No, it isn't okay when a director tries to pass off recycled, cliché garbage as revolutionary. Cameron spent 12 years making this film and he had to lift the storyline directly from Dances With Wolves? Not that I (or anyone else should have) expected more from James Cameron--he makes easy to digest escapism. You have your hand held throughout the entire film. You know who the good guys are, who the bad guys are, who to root for and what's going to happen within the first 15 minutes of the film. No challenges, no surprises. The film is literally a time-sucker. You watch it to waste 3 hours and take absolutely nothing else from it. If that's your thing, you'll fucking love it.

12-28-2009, 06:33 PM	#106 (permalink)
NumberNineDream Blue Bleezin' Blind Drunk Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: The land of the largest wine glass (aka Lebanon) Posts: 2,200	__________________ Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Welcome to the Black Lodge

12-29-2009, 12:04 PM	#108 (permalink)
NSW Bigger and Better Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Texas girl living in the UK Posts: 2,596	Because the story line is simple, and it's been done before. But that's ok. To me it enhanced the rest of the movie, like the visuals and the acting. Simple story lines aren't always a bad thing. __________________ Hi.

12-28-2009, 06:32 PM	#105 (permalink)
~~bungalow~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hot-lanta Posts: 3,140	The only reason to see this is the visuals. And that really isn't much of a reason.

12-29-2009, 01:59 PM	#110 (permalink)
~~bungalow~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hot-lanta Posts: 3,140	No, it isn't okay when a director tries to pass off recycled, cliché garbage as revolutionary. Cameron spent 12 years making this film and he had to lift the storyline directly from Dances With Wolves? Not that I (or anyone else should have) expected more from James Cameron--he makes easy to digest escapism. You have your hand held throughout the entire film. You know who the good guys are, who the bad guys are, who to root for and what's going to happen within the first 15 minutes of the film. No challenges, no surprises. The film is literally a time-sucker. You watch it to waste 3 hours and take absolutely nothing else from it. If that's your thing, you'll fucking love it.