Alfred

Well let's have a look here.

Let's assume that each console has 20 quality exclusives okay?

Here are some of the highest rated multiplatform titles:

Resident Evil 5
Bioshock
Call Of Duty: World At War
Call Of Duty 4
Grand Theft Auto IV
Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion
Fallout 3
Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
Burnout Paradise
Dead Space
Skate
Fight Night Round 4
Guitar Hero
Rock Band

All of these titles are on the PS3 and Xbox 360, about 3 of them are on the Wii... therefore, the Wii has a smaller library of quality games.

I'm not trying to dis the Wii, I love the Wii, but facts is facts.

__________________

Dr.Seussicide

What does this have to do with anything?

__________________

Alfred

An earlier argument that Boo Boo made about multiplatform titles not mattering.

__________________

mr dave

while i agree with you, regardless of your last line you just set yourself up for a serious reaming hahaha.

__________________
i am the universe

boo boo

That makes absolutely no sense.

It's no secret that The Wii lacks multiplatform games because of it's inferior processing power, and I really don't care. Multiplatform games don't make a console better, if anything they just make a console more worthless when all it has are multiplatform games that are also on a superior console with it's own exclusives to match, this is why PS3 is completely worthless.

In the old days, consoles had their own personality, their own differences, back then even when games went multiplatform, they were still very different for each platform. This meant that sometimes the SNES version was best, and sometimes the Genesis version was best, and sometimes even the Turbografx16 or Neo Geo versions were best. Same with the PS1, N61 and Saturn, multiplatform games faired very differently depending on that console's pros and cons as well as what kind of game it was, it meant that a console could claim a multiplatform game as it's own if the others sucked in comparison. Fighting games were best on the Saturn, Sports games were best on N64 and so on.

But now, 360 version or PS3 version, it really doesn't make a difference, 360 has so few first parties and it still manages to put out more games on third party support alone, the fact that it's better than PS3 despite having a tendency to just f*cking blow up whenever it feels like it is just a testament to how sh*thouse the PS3 actually is.

The Wii makes up for it's lackluster third party support with an excellent first party library, and it does too have a few great third party games, many of which have the great fortune of also being exclusives. I'd say it's exclusive library surpasses PS3 but of course there's nothing written in stone, it's all subjective opinion.

Except PS3 sucking ass, that's objective.

__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

mr dave

yes.... this would have absolutely nothing at all to do with the relative simplicity of developing for the 360 as opposed to the continued learning curve of the ps3. hmmm what are games developed on? and who makes the OS most pcs run on? and who creates the bulk of application programming interfaces most games use (direct X)? i seem to recall early PR for the 360 being tantamount to the console being a stand alone gaming pc. geez... i wonder WHY so many 3rd party games come out for the 360... could it possibly be that the publishers realized that it offered a better cut of the market than releasing on the pc and had significantly less piracy? NOOooooooo it must be because the ps3 sucks.

you're continued self imposed ignorance of the realities of development and anti-sony fanboyism is really getting old.

__________________
i am the universe

boo boo

Your arguments are really awful.

So you're telling me the PS3 can't get support because the 360 has more market appeal for PC gamers, and because of how difficult it is to program for and that somehow proves it DOESN'T suck?

Great argument.

Lets see, the PS3 couldn't even beat a console that had already been out for a year (and it's usually that kinda timing that sends consoles to an early grave, especially in Sega's case), or even The Wii which has no multimedia capabilities, inferior graphics and relatively little third party support.

Yeah, I'd say it's pretty much a total failure.

__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Alfred

You frustrate me so much.

In another thread I showed that the PS3 matches the Xbox 360's quantity of quality titles... yet here you go again. OH THE PS3 ONLY HAS QUALITY MULTIPLATFORM TITLES AND THEREFORE ITS A PEACE OF SHIT 400 DOLLAR PAPERWEIGHT

Maybe this would be true if we were talking about the PS3's FIRST SIX MONTHS on the market. This is 2009 for Pete's sake, and I could easily name ten quality exclusive titles off the top of my head that you will find nowhere else.

__________________