What do you guys think about FF13 losing its exclusivity

boo boo · 07-21-2009, 12:44 PM

Sony is so f*cked right now.

GTA and FF were their trump cards, they couldn't have beaten Nintendo without them, they don't have them anymore, the only thing they have left is MGS, and it probably wont be long until it goes multiplatform too.

360 and PS3 are basically the same damn console, so what reason do third party developers have to make games exclusive to just one of them? Well for whatever reason 360 has way more exclusives, so save a few first party titles, PS3 ain't got jack sh*t.

lucifer_sam · 07-21-2009, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

Sony is so f*cked right now.

GTA and FF were their trump cards, they couldn't have beaten Nintendo without them, they don't have them anymore, the only thing they have left is MGS, and it probably wont be long until it goes multiplatform too.

360 and PS3 are basically the same damn console, so what reason do third party developers have to make games exclusive to just one of them? Well for whatever reason 360 has way more exclusives, so save a few first party titles, PS3 ain't got jack sh*t.

wrong. because like Microsoft and unlike Nintendo, the PS3 is only a small part of Sony's market share of electronics & software. they could continue to make platforms like they do now and not experience any adverse effects for years to come. they've stabilized their revenue enough from other ventures to be able to endure the loss of a franchise or two.

boo boo · 07-21-2009, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucifer_sam

wrong. because like Microsoft and unlike Nintendo, the PS3 is only a small part of Sony's market share of electronics & software. they could continue to make platforms like they do now and not experience any adverse effects for years to come. they've stabilized their revenue enough from other ventures to be able to endure the loss of a franchise or two.

In other words, they can pretty much get away with making sh*tty, useless consoles for decades to come.

Hooray for multimedia corporations.

lucifer_sam · 07-21-2009, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

In other words, they can pretty much get away with making sh*tty, useless consoles for decades to come.

Hooray for multimedia corporations.

what the fuck are you talking about? the PS3 is easily way more stabile than the 360 and with a much faster processor & better graphics card than the Wii. if not for the seeming lack of titles (which there really isn't, it has well over 550 titles), it would easily be the best console this generation, and for good reason. it makes the 360 look like a piece of garbage and the Wii look like a child's toy (which they invariably are).

boo boo · 07-21-2009, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucifer_sam

what the fuck are you talking about? the PS3 is easily way more stabile than the 360 and with a much faster processor & better graphics card than the Wii. if not for the seeming lack of titles (which there really isn't, it has well over 550 titles), it would easily be the best console this generation, and for good reason. it makes the 360 look like a piece of garbage and the Wii look like a child's toy (which they invariably are).

And how many exclusives?

You have to be a ridiculously devoted fanboy to actually argue that the PS3 is better than 360.

Processing power, graphics and multimedia capabilities mean nothing when it lacks worthwhile games, 360 and Wii both assrape the PS3 in that regard.

Alfred · 07-21-2009, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

Wii

The Wii may be able to match the amount of exclusives that the PS3 has, but how many of the good multiplatform titles like Bioshock, Call Of Duty 4, GTA IV, does the Wii have? World At War... that's about it.

boo boo · 07-21-2009, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alfred

The Wii may be able to match the amount of exclusives that the PS3 has, but how many of the good multiplatform titles like Bioshock, Call Of Duty 4, GTA IV, does the Wii have? World At War... that's about it.

Why does a console need multiplatform titles?

Can't it have a little personality? Sheesh.

lucifer_sam · 07-21-2009, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

And how many exclusives?

You have to be a ridiculously devoted fanboy to actually argue that the PS3 is better than 360.

Processing power, graphics and multimedia capabilities mean nothing when it lacks worthwhile games, 360 and Wii both assrape the PS3 in that regard.

no kidding, that's why they're performing better in the sales department.

doesn't mean i would ever consider purchasing a piece of shit that overheats every week because it was designed by some illiterate troglodyte that can't understand the concept of where to put a fucking fan.

Dr.Seussicide · 07-21-2009, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

Sony is so f*cked right now.

GTA and FF were their trump cards, they couldn't have beaten Nintendo without them, they don't have them anymore, the only thing they have left is MGS, and it probably wont be long until it goes multiplatform too.

360 and PS3 are basically the same damn console, so what reason do third party developers have to make games exclusive to just one of them? Well for whatever reason 360 has way more exclusives, so save a few first party titles, PS3 ain't got jack sh*t.

This is basically what I what saying... Sony needs their exclusive rights to these trademark games... or else xbox will inevitably win this next gen console war.