Batlord mode: THANKS FOR THE ****ING SPOILER!!!!!!!! :mad:
https://31.media.tumblr.com/8e512927...btk7o1_500.gif
This statement is incorrect. Reaper was awful.
Probably one of the best in the franchise. Season?
You're an idiot. :) There are so many differences, I ... I just don't know where to begin...

This was an entire ****ing season before?
but yeah Buffy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SPN, no ****ing contest
Buffy Summers shaped me into the woman I am today.

I have five seasons yet to watch! You think I get to write all my journals, including Metal Month every year, keep "Love or Hate?" and "The Torture Chamber" going while ALSO getting to watch all my favourite shows?? I have seasons of shows to watch!

Seriously: spoiler anything like that. Just because you haven't seen it does not mean everyone else has!
(Grump over, but you made the list).

ANd wtf has Buffy to do with Supernatural? Answer: nothing. Stop comparing the two shows.

I'm just putting this here.

The basic premise and style of humor are identical. If they've managed to make something of it, then good for them, but it's still a Buffy knockoff at heart.

Same here, girlfriend.

There are similarities, but you could say that about any "hip" show. What about Grimm? Tremors? Dresden Files? Being Human? It's more important how many differences there are:

Sam and Dean are travelling, not static in one location ie Sunnydale
There are basically only two main characters
There is an overall story arc, and while there was one in Buffy, later, it wasn't apparent as it is in Supernatural from the get-go
The boys face generally different monsters most weeks, unlike with Buffy where it's more or less vampires, vampires and, um, vampires. Oh, and vampires.
Main "bad guy" pretty much all through the series (what I've seen of it anyway)

I found it to be highly original, and apart from some superficial similarities, would definitely not compare it to Buffy, which was a totally different animal altogether.

Grimm is most definitely a Buffy knockoff. It's even made by many of the same people.

Not a significant difference.

Not a significant difference.

Different story lines ≠ original series concept

Have you seen Buffy? Robots, giant praying mantises, mummies, zombies, more types of demons than you could shake a stick at, etc.

And it's not an accomplishment that Supernatural doesn't stick to vampires. If it did, then it would be not just a Buffy knockoff, but a complete Buffy clone. It's just common sense for them to try to come up with a premise that they can pass off as original. Like Grimm.

Different story lines ≠ original series concept

Prog dweebs.

http://media0.giphy.com/media/qmfpjpAT2fJRK/giphy.gif

Again, the premise is not even vaguely similar, unless you take monster-hunting as the premise, and if you do that you have to include a whole lot more shows.

Go back to your comics, Bat-boy.
:)
Also, just exactly how much of Supernatural have you actually seen? I seem to remember you telling me you watched "the odd episode". Hardly gives you the experience in it that allows you to start comparing it to other shows?

Yes, there are a lot of Buffy knockoffs.

"How can you say you don't like the Beatles when you haven't heard every single song they've ever written?!"

Ah man! You're slipping! You can't compare the two. If you're going to talk about a show, and then compare it to another show, you can't do that by watching one or two episodes. Just doesn't work. Do you even know the arc in Supernatural, what it's all about?

You know who you sound like now, don't you? ;)