Guybrush |
01-15-2011 08:31 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuna
(Post 986168)
Good point, I was joking anyways. Plus FF had it's peak on Sony's console.
And I disagree strongly, FF is far better then Zelda imo. Maybe that's just because I highly value story though in my games.
|
FFVI is generally considered the best of the final fantasies on snes. I have played both that and A Link to the Past. While I like both, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that A Link to the Past is the most entertaining game to play. Even if FFVI lasts longer, you may have more fun putting the same amount of hours into A Link to the Past and completing it several times, I feel.
Don't get me wrong, FF VI was brilliant and it's a game I love. But I think that more than a great story, FFVI had a lot of story. If you played it again, you'd see that there were a lot of clichès, the dialogues were embarassingly bad at worst and so on. It was good, but not all of that was genious.
Anyways, it was more than good enough actually. The biggest problem with FFVI is that the gameplay and all the random encounters in the game simply didn't stay interesting for the amount of time it took to complete the game. When A Link to the Past was fun to play from start to end, in FFVI, I got really tired of the game and oh-so-boring random encounters long before I even approached the end. I think I finished the game on my third attempt. The first two attempts, I just got too bored. The story and stuff was fun, but again, it couldn't quite make up for all that tedious combat ..
So for me, A Link to the Past > Final Fantasy VI
Actually, I consider A Link to the Past the best (most entertaining) SNES game I've ever played and I've played all the big ones, including all rpg titles like secret of Mana, Breath of Fire 1 and 2 or Chrono Trigger. Hence, I don't really agree that it's overrated. If you want entertainment from an SNES, it's the safest bet in my opinion.
|