|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-23-2009, 05:24 PM | #1131 (permalink) |
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
Borderlands was awesome for a good week or two and then it was over. it's not bad at all though, might be more replayability if you're playing with real friends as opposed to strangers on the net. it's the best mashup of Unreal Tournament and Diablo that i've ever had the fun of blasting my way through.
|
11-23-2009, 05:33 PM | #1132 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
So, I need to check out the Orange Box and Bioshock.
Are there any other first person shooters (available for PC) that you guys think might appeal to my tastes? |
11-23-2009, 06:59 PM | #1133 (permalink) | |
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
Quote:
i wouldn't necessarily call it a FPS necessarily but Fallout3 is also well worth playing. also if you can get your hands on a copy of No One Lives Forever do it (part 1 over 2, but it doesn't really matter - they're both fantastic) |
|
11-23-2009, 07:04 PM | #1134 (permalink) | |
Cardboard Box Realtor
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hobb's End
Posts: 7,648
|
Quote:
|
|
11-23-2009, 07:16 PM | #1136 (permalink) |
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
i watched my roommate play through Dead Space. that was enough for me, there's a reason they were selling it for $20. (short - REALLY short after the first go too)
haven't tried L4D but i really like the premise behind it and the relatively forced co-op. it's similar to Borderlands in a way where you have to chose between 4 pre-generated character types but working together is key to victory as opposed to a matter of efficiency. @LP - it's too bad you were expecting depth in Borderlands. although i don't think they ever really tried to play it up as anything more than brainless action. i'll agree that the never ending bandit camps were getting really old by the end of it. even just retexturing some of the bad guys to some sort of paramilitary uniform and calling them mercenary camps instead would have been a welcome breath of fresh air. it's really crappy that you have to pay more than the game itself to play it online though. |
11-23-2009, 07:22 PM | #1137 (permalink) | |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Quote:
L4D is at it's best when I'm playing it online with friends. It's a sort of quick action fix for me, I usually play it for no more than half an hour-hour at a time, but it's a lot of fun. Dead Space is one of the most memorable of the more recent games (say since 2007) for me, a real gem. You might not know it from the first half hour or so but just a little bit longer in and the game gets seriously addictive. Tons of spooks and lots of fun. To Boo, how about the first Crysis game? It wasn't quite as brilliant as BioShock and the orange box games, but still fun and well worth the money and effort. Actually, I'd say most of the recent FPS games are rather good and enjoyable. I'd argue that BioShock is more fun than System Shock 2. Maybe not more awe-inspiring and brilliant, but talking sheer entertainment value - I think it is.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
|
11-23-2009, 08:16 PM | #1138 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,845
|
I'm a fan of Far Cry 2 as well as the already mentioned Fallout 3 and Crysis. All three of those are definitely more open-world and sandbox than Bioshock or Half Life, but all of the games are great. You might want to start with Half Life 2, as I find it makes kind of an awesome introduction to the shooter genre because the guns are simplistic but awesome (except for the gravity gun which is just awesome) and the level design is fantastic. Bioshock is kind of just Half Life with special powers and more depth in that there weapon upgrades, plasmids and tonics, and other things to mess around with that Half Life doesn't have. I also haven't played System Shock 2 so I can't say which I prefer. I generally find older games to be slower, which might appeal to you.
|
11-23-2009, 08:24 PM | #1139 (permalink) |
Juicious Maximus III
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
|
Far Cry 2 is a good example of what I meant about most recent FPSes I've played as being good. FC2 is one of the weaker titles, but it was still good enough for me to play through which is actually a bit of a task because the game is rather long!
I loved the open world of it, but the reason it drops down on my list is that it's action is horribly repetitive. You drive around with cars a lot and meet human guard posts with enemies that attack you relentlessly every 100 metres in a huge world. Let's say you kill all of them, drive 50 metres down the road away from the guard post - and then drive back .. all the enemies you just killed have respawned. Gods dammit. Also you fight the same kind of people throughout the game. It's just non-stop of the same stuff over and over .. the rest of the game intrigues though, the story and the setting and the characters. It's weird that they made it so repetitive really. Red Faction Guerilla, although a 3rd person shooter, suffers from the same problem.
__________________
Something Completely Different |
11-23-2009, 08:29 PM | #1140 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,845
|
Quote:
Also, I played the Batman: Arkham Asylum demo the other day and now I want to get it. Has anyone here played it and is it good? |
|
|