|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-06-2009, 05:20 PM | #421 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Well duh.
Genesis does what Nintendon't. |
10-06-2009, 06:11 PM | #423 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Blah. I disagree. If you want to argue that the top 10 SNES games are better than any Genesis game, fine.
But I think the Genesis has produced more quality titles overall. I admit, I'm a bit biased, the Genesis is basically my favorite console. Thing is they were two very different consoles marketed towards different types of gamers. Genesis was much more about fast paced action games that were easy to pick up and play but hard as hell to beat. While SNES was much more about adventure and strategic games that required a little more time and patience. I love both styles of gameplay. But the Genesis comes out on top for me, it just has more games that I love. |
10-06-2009, 09:30 PM | #424 (permalink) | |
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
Quote:
the only thing that really set the genesis apart in the day was that they released first. then again sega was always hung up on the idea of releasing first. seems that worked out swimmingly for them... i seem to remember far more kids bugging me to borrow my snes in exchange for their genesis than the other way around. |
|
10-06-2009, 09:42 PM | #425 (permalink) | |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Quote:
I thought I was the Nintendo fanboy here. And why is it that everytime somebody dares say they prefer the Genesis to SNES someone starts rambling about how the SNES was perfect and how the Genesis sucks and blah blah blah? The console war is over, SNES might have sold more units, but sales dosen't equal superior quality, I don't care if the SNES had better graphics and sound, or more popular brand name franchises. Those are not the only things that make a console superior. Which had the better games is just personal opinion. I think that the Genesis was more revolutionary personally, since it did come first, and started off the first serious console competition. |
|
10-06-2009, 10:01 PM | #426 (permalink) |
nothing
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 4,315
|
your opinion is fine but flawed and skewed
no one is rambling about how the snes was perfect but you did make this claim... anything on the genesis can stand up to the top 10 on the snes... now a top 100 snes vs. a top 100 genesis then cutting out the filler to see who had the best quality might make for an interesting discussion. |
10-06-2009, 10:30 PM | #427 (permalink) | |
Cardboard Box Realtor
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hobb's End
Posts: 7,648
|
Quote:
|
|
10-06-2009, 10:37 PM | #428 (permalink) | ||
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Quote:
I just think the Genesis has more good games (that are also exclusives) and while most SNES classics are based on tried and true franchises of the NES era, by comparison Sega didn't have a bunch of big name franchises so they had to start from scratch, many Genesis games were based around more original gameplay mechanics, so they were a bit more fresh to some people. Quote:
Last edited by boo boo; 10-06-2009 at 10:45 PM. |
||
10-06-2009, 10:48 PM | #429 (permalink) |
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
|
Gamecube is number 11 btw.
|
|