|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-09-2008, 08:38 PM | #44 (permalink) | ||
Da Hiphopopotamus
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
|
King Kong did not suck.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
03-09-2008, 09:10 PM | #46 (permalink) | ||
Da Hiphopopotamus
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
|
No it didn't. Good effects and acting, better than the orignal with the rapist looking kong.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
03-10-2008, 03:22 PM | #49 (permalink) | ||
Da Hiphopopotamus
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cloud cuckoo land
Posts: 4,034
|
The orignal sucked..kong had one expression through out the movie
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
03-10-2008, 03:33 PM | #50 (permalink) |
Ba and Be.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
|
It was made in 1933 and was a monumental achievement in special effects in it's day. Films over a certain age may well look dated but if you take into in account that stop motion was in it's infancy, you can then appreciate the film. Look beyond it's shortcomings and find a rich and rewarding film.
__________________
“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
|
|