What's The Latest Film You Have Seen?

Violent & Funky · 08-05-2010, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NumberNineDream

What the fuk is that supposed to mean ? I can't get if you're dissing the painting or the film.

I'm dissing the comparison...

NumberNineDream · 08-05-2010, 07:37 PM

It's just that they're complementary, and in a way Cinema is a extension to all the other forms of Art. Putting away a whole decade, which also the most revolutionary decade in Cinema History and the one that has made what cinema is now, and the cinema you love so much, is very much pure ignorance.

90s and 00s cinema didn't pop out from nowhere, and neither did Cinema. AND DON'T YOU EVER DISREGARD PAINTING IN THAT MANNER!!

Violent & Funky · 08-05-2010, 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dankrsta

I made an analogy to prove my point, to make it easier to see. They're both art forms, they both use a technology and in both cases their artistic value doesn't depend on it.

Actually, film does rely on technology because it didn't exist until thousands of years later with the invention of film recording...

Violent & Funky · 08-05-2010, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NumberNineDream

It's just that they're complementary, and in a way Cinema is a extension to all the other forms of Art. Putting away a whole decade, which also the most revolutionary decade in Cinema History and the one that has made what cinema is now, and the cinema you love so much, is very much pure ignorance.

90s and 00s cinema didn't pop out from nowhere, and neither did Cinema. AND DON'T YOU EVER DISREGARD PAINTING IN THAT MANNER!!

Haha well without cave paintings there wouldn't be Da Vinci but I ain't gonna go to a cave art gallery...

NumberNineDream · 08-05-2010, 07:40 PM

^Why won't you? Disregarding a whole civilisation just because it's old? Ever felt like knowing why they were painting these bulls on the wall ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Violent & Funky

Actually, film does rely on technology because it didn't exist until thousands of years later with the invention of film recording...

Not really. Animation existed, and it was projected to the masses.

Violent & Funky · 08-05-2010, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NumberNineDream

^Why won't you? Disregarding a whole civilisation just because it's old? Ever felt like knowing why they were painting these bulls on the wall ?

Because it's boring and I have other hobbies that I would prefer to devote my time to. I'd rather play video games or go to a baseball game or cook or read or listen to music or something.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NumberNineDream

Not really. Animation existed, and it was projected to the masses.

When was the first animated film? Ancient Rome?

And the difference between this animation and say Inception is comparable to the difference between a Renaissance painting and today's computer-aided painting? Gimme a break...

NumberNineDream · 08-05-2010, 07:56 PM

If you prefer playing baseball, it doesn't mean that the thousands of years dedicated to Art are not worthy of the Humanity's interest. The Universe doesn't revolve around your interest.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Violent & Funky

And the difference between this animation and say Inception is comparable to the difference between a Renaissance painting and today's computer-aided painting? Gimme a break...

I'm just gonna say that: Inception - M.C Escher = Zero.

Violent & Funky · 08-05-2010, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NumberNineDream

If you prefer playing baseball, it doesn't mean that the thousands of years dedicated to Art are not worthy of the Humanity's interest. The Universe doesn't revolve around your interest.

This is about my preferences. I don't care if you go to cave art galleries, that's your prerogative. Just don't call me out for not watching 60s movies because I don't want to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NumberNineDream

I'm just gonna say that: Inception - M.C Escher = Zero.

You got me!

Dr.Seussicide · 08-05-2010, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Violent & Funky

This is about my preferences. I don't care if you go to cave art galleries, that's your prerogative. Just don't call me out for not watching 60s movies because I don't want to.

You got me!

I think, and I'm just throwing this out there, I think! She just wants you to respect the art. And that's all.

NumberNineDream · 08-05-2010, 08:04 PM

^Edit:Thank you Seuss

Quote:

Originally Posted by Violent & Funky

This is about my preferences. I don't care if you go to cave art galleries, that's your prerogative. Just don't call me out for not watching 60s movies because I don't want to.

All I wanted to say:
If you found that film good, you can't say "it's not bad for a 60s film", but you can say, that you don't usually find this genre of films appealing, and was surprised by that one.

You just can't talk about your opinion so factually. I have my least favourite cinematic genres, but I just can't say they're boring, cz they played a role in the cinematic evolution.

08-05-2010, 07:37 PM	#7522 (permalink)
NumberNineDream Blue Bleezin' Blind Drunk Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: The land of the largest wine glass (aka Lebanon) Posts: 2,200	It's just that they're complementary, and in a way Cinema is a extension to all the other forms of Art. Putting away a whole decade, which also the most revolutionary decade in Cinema History and the one that has made what cinema is now, and the cinema you love so much, is very much pure ignorance. 90s and 00s cinema didn't pop out from nowhere, and neither did Cinema. AND DON'T YOU EVER DISREGARD PAINTING IN THAT MANNER!! __________________ Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do cats eat bats? Do cats eat bats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats?Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Do bats eat cats? Welcome to the Black Lodge