Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Media (https://www.musicbanter.com/media/)
-   -   What's The Latest Film You Have Seen? (https://www.musicbanter.com/media/26687-whats-latest-film-you-have-seen.html)

Justthefacts 06-29-2018 06:51 PM

The Dark Knight > Inception > The Prestige > Insomnia > The Dark Knight Rises > Dunkirk > Batman Begins > Memento > Instellar

Never seen Following, yet. Interstellar's first half is admittedly really good, but it completely loses me in the final act. Those special effects are laughable and Nolan should be ashamed for that.

YorkeDaddy 06-29-2018 07:11 PM

The Dark Knight > Memento > The Prestige > Interstellar > Inception > Dark Knight Rises > Batman Begins > Dunkirk > Insomnia

Key 06-29-2018 07:47 PM

Dark Knight Rises over Batman Begins? Now that's blasphemy.

Frownland 06-29-2018 07:48 PM

Memento > Following > The Dark Knight > The Prestige > Insomnia > Instellar > Inception > Batman Begins > The Dark Knight Rises

Never watched the propaganda film.

Justthefacts 06-29-2018 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1967990)
Memento > Following > The Dark Knight > The Prestige > Insomnia > Instellar > Inception > Batman Begins > The Dark Knight Rises

Never watched the propaganda film.

Saw that bitch in IMAX.

Frownland 06-29-2018 07:59 PM

I saw Inception in Imax stoned as **** when I was 15 or 16. I expected it to be trippier tbh.

YorkeDaddy 06-29-2018 08:04 PM

Dunkirk a propaganda film? Because it’s about World War II? I dont get it

Frownland 06-29-2018 08:11 PM

I didn't see it, I just automatically assume that every war film is propaganda.

The Batlord 06-29-2018 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy (Post 1968002)
Dunkirk a propaganda film? Because it’s about World War II? I dont get it

War movies generally glorify soldiers, intentionally or otherwise. The gist is often that veterans went through crazy **** and we should respect them which by extension leads to support for the military and war even if the public aren't aware of it. I'd say that it's entirely possible that Saving Private Ryan is responsible for countless deaths by glorifying WW2 veterans and being probably the biggest war movie of all time. How many people were influenced to join the military and suck soldier cock because of that movie? Dunkirk's better about that than most movies since it doesn't glorify the soldiers themselves for the most part, but it does glorify the "miracle" which serves much the same purpose.

Frownland 06-29-2018 08:15 PM

Thanks, Doug.

Key 06-29-2018 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1968003)
I didn't see it, I just automatically assume that every war film is propaganda.

I mean...aren't they? I agree with you.

YorkeDaddy 06-29-2018 08:24 PM

So should war movies not exist? I think it’s important to convey history through other mediums than just reading. A textbook about war will never be able to convey the horrors of it as well as a good, historically accurate film can

Key 06-29-2018 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy (Post 1968009)
So should war movies not exist? I think it’s important to convey history through other mediums than just reading. A textbook about war will never be able to convey the horrors of it as well as a good, historically accurate film can

I don't like war movies so I'm probably biased. I've never really watched a war film and was like "man, that was great"

YorkeDaddy 06-29-2018 08:29 PM

I’m not a fan of war movies either but I think they have a good reason to exist and the propaganda aspect is an unfortunate side effect that I don’t think can be fixed

Frownland 06-29-2018 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy (Post 1968009)
So should war movies not exist? I think it’s important to convey history through other mediums than just reading. A textbook about war will never be able to convey the horrors of it as well as a good, historically accurate film can

Make a documentary and use real footage of war crimes.

YorkeDaddy 06-29-2018 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1968016)
Make a documentary and use real footage of war crimes.

The masses would never watch that

...Though that very sentiment is why these films can often feel like propaganda, so yeah I’m seeing where you’re coming from

Key 06-29-2018 08:35 PM

Oh I think they should definitely exist but I've never watched one and thought "yeah, I believe that happened." Unfortunate side effect I suppose.

Frownland 06-29-2018 08:36 PM

The masses are a bunch of bitches though.

YorkeDaddy 06-29-2018 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiiii (Post 1968018)
Oh I think they should definitely exist but I've never watched one and thought "yeah, I believe that happened." Unfortunate side effect I suppose.

What about films that aren’t about war necessarily but about awful sections of history? Schindler’s List, 12 Years a Slave, etc

Key 06-29-2018 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy (Post 1968020)
What about films that aren’t about war necessarily but about awful sections of history? Schindler’s List, 12 Years a Slave, etc

That's a fair argument and honestly, I can't not agree because Schindlers List is a fantastic representation of what happened in that time. Definitely one of my favorite movies for sure.

The Batlord 06-29-2018 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy (Post 1968020)
What about films that aren’t about war necessarily but about awful sections of history? Schindler’s List, 12 Years a Slave, etc

If they don't include action scenes that makes people go, "Whoa, ****ing explosions, dude, now I want to shoot terrorists!" then I guess it's okay. But that would take out 90% of the fun of war movies. Saving Private Ryan is still a badass action movie.

Chula Vista 06-29-2018 09:23 PM

Anyone who joined the service because of watching Saving Private Ryan was a ****ed up human being long before that movie was made.

Nice broad brush re: movies about war fellas.

Key 06-29-2018 09:24 PM

I've not said anything about war movies other than I don't like them and explained why. They're perfectly fine, just not my taste.

Chula Vista 06-29-2018 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiiii (Post 1968034)
I've not said anything about war movies other than I don't like them and explained why. They're perfectly fine, just not my taste.

Was mainly directed at Frown and Bat.

The Batlord 06-29-2018 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1968033)
Anyone who joined the service because of watching Saving Private Ryan was a ****ed up human being long before that movie was made.

Nice broad brush re: movies about war fellas.

Yes we get that you are a slave to your own emotional interpretations of everything in general and are incapable of tempering them with logic.

The entire reason people watch war movies is to watch a glorified action movie. The entire reason they're made is to be glorified action movies, no matter what the director says. There are war movies that have important things to say, but that's not why people go to the movies. And the only war movies I ever see that you can make a case for not being propaganda are ones that go out of their way to **** on soldiers at least individually: Platoon, Full Metal Jacket, or that one movie with Emilio Estevez about Vietnam soldiers raping some woman.

Key 06-29-2018 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1968035)
Was mainly directed at Frown and Bat.

Gotcha. Just clarifying is all.

Frownland 06-29-2018 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1968033)
Anyone who joined the service because of watching Saving Private Ryan was a ****ed up human being long before that movie was made.

Nice broad brush re: movies about war fellas.

Mostly true. Anyone who served in the military is a ****ed up human being. Many people join without knowing what they're getting into when they sign up.

I love me a ton of war films but I can't think of one that isn't propaganda.

Justthefacts 06-29-2018 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1968041)
Mostly true. Anyone who served in the military is a ****ed up human being. Many people join without knowing what they're getting into when they sign up.

I love me a ton of war films but I can't think of one that isn't propaganda.

Braveheart?

The Batlord 06-29-2018 09:59 PM

I thought The Patriot was pretty fair and non-sensationalist.

Frownland 06-29-2018 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1968050)
I thought The Patriot was pretty fair and non-sensationalist.

Can't forget Battleship Potemkin.

Chula Vista 06-29-2018 10:15 PM

The Deer Hunter.
Apocalypse Now.
The Boys in Company C.
Johnny Got His Gun.
Coming Home.
Black Hawk Down.
Platoon.
Grave of the Fireflies.
Paths of Glory.
Das Boot.
Casualties of War.
Friendly Fire.
Hamburger Hill.

Again, not cool to broad brush.

Frownland 06-29-2018 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1968052)
The Deer Hunter.
Apocalypse Now.
The Boys in Company C.
Johnny Got His Gun.
Coming Home.
Black Hawk Down.
Platoon.
Grave of the Fireflies.
Paths of Glory.
Das Boot.
Casualties of War.
Friendly Fire.
Hamburger Hill.

Again, not cool to broad brush.

It's not cool to strawman, either. Propaganda is not synonymous with bad art. ****, some of the best art is propaganda because it has ridiculous government funding behind it.

The Batlord 06-29-2018 10:21 PM

Holy ****, Blackhawk Down? Really? That's one of the worst. You might as well add We Were Soldiers to the list.

Frownland 06-29-2018 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1968054)
Holy ****, Blackhawk Down? Really? That's one of the worst. You might as well add We Were Soldiers to the list.

You just wish that you were as cool as Chula was when he watched it.

The Batlord 06-29-2018 10:33 PM

And don't most American war movies get backed by the Pentagon so the movie makers can get their expertise and equipment without having to actually buy their own military, of course so long as the military gets to have input on the script?

Chula Vista 06-29-2018 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1968054)
Holy ****, Blackhawk Down? Really? That's one of the worst. You might as well add We Were Soldiers to the list.

A document of one of the most disastrous US military operations in modern history where the US got their asses absolutely kicked and were made to look like inept fools the entire time? Ya, military propaganda for sure. :usehead:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle...litary_fallout

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1968056)
You just wish that you were as cool as Chula was when he watched it.

Don't resort to your old ways. I was getting use to the new and improved you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1968060)
And don't most American war movies get backed by the Pentagon so the movie makers can get their expertise and equipment without having to actually buy their own military, of course so long as the military gets to have input on the script?

If you think that any of the movies I listed were approved and financed by the US military you are hopeless. All of these movies demonized war and the military, and made joining and fighting in a war look like absolute hell. Not exactly a recruitment tool for our armed services.

Ever seen Coming Home or Friendly Fire? The pentagon was pissing hollow point bullets when those two got so many critical accolades.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friendly_Fire_(1979_film)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coming_Home_(1978_film)

Frownland 06-29-2018 11:01 PM

The ones that I've seen on the list demonize war by way of sympathizing the war criminals aka troops. Boom, propaganda. Pun intended.

The Batlord 06-29-2018 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1968064)
A document of one of the most disastrous US military operations in modern history where the US got their asses absolutely kicked and were made to look like inept fools the entire time? Ya, military propaganda for sure. :usehead:

And look at how ****ing badass our boys are while getting out of that nigger-infested hellhole! Don't **** with Oosa! Pew pew pew!!!

Up your critical thinking game, bro.

Quote:

If you think that any of the movies I listed were approved and financed by the US military you are hopeless. All of these movies demonized war and the military, and made joining and fighting in a war look like absolute hell. Not exactly a recruitment tool for our armed services.

Ever seen Coming Home or Friendly Fire? The pentagon was pissing hollow point bullets when those two got so many critical accolades.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friendly_Fire_(1979_film)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coming_Home_(1978_film)
That's how they get all that equipment. If you see a movie with a tank in it then it was probably given to the producers on condition that the military not be demonized. Black Hawk Down is a good example. Ewan McGregor's character was based on a soldier who was convicted of sexually assaulting his daughter and the military didn't like that so "SPC John Stebbins" (real guy) became "SPC John Grimes" (fake guy).

https://nypost.com/2001/12/18/war-fi...o-is-a-rapist/

Quote:

The Army pressured the filmmakers of “Black Hawk Down” to change the name of the war hero portrayed by Ewan McGregor – because the real-life soldier is serving a 30-year prison term for rape and child molestation, says the man who wrote the book that spawned the movie.

Chula Vista 06-29-2018 11:20 PM

Black Hawk Down made the US military (and government) look like ****. You still implying it had the Pentagon's backing? And funding? Simply because one soldier was a PR nightmare?

Way to lose sight of the big picture. Movie was extremely well made with lots of awesome special FX, but if at the end of it you felt compelled to join the army..... well, you were pretty damn ****ed up years before the movie came out.

That movie, along with the other's I listed, completely destroyed the John Wayne "America, Gung-Ho" cliche forever.

Wanna watch propaganda? Check out "The Green Berets". Don't be drinking any soda during it. You might hurt your nostrils.

The Batlord 06-29-2018 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 1968069)
Black Hawk Down made the US military (and government) look like ****. You still implying it had the Pentagon's backing? And funding? Simply because one soldier was a PR nightmare?

Way to lose sight of the big picture. Movie was extremely well made with lots of awesome special FX, but if at the end of it you felt compelled to join the army..... well, you were pretty damn ****ed up years before the movie came out.

That movie, along with the other's I listed, completely destroyed the John Wayne "America, Gung-Ho" cliche forever.

Wanna watch propaganda? Check out "The Green Berets". Don't be drinking any soda during it. You might hurt your nostrils.

Oh my bad you're totally right. There was no military involvement in Black Hawk Down.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...=.4a82fd5982bc

Quote:

That version of events and the portrayal of what it was like to fight in the streets of Mogadishu were shaped by Army Rangers and Delta Force soldiers who survived the mission, and by the Department of Defense, which provided extensive support -- Black Hawk helicopters, equipment, trained pilots and Special Forces -- to the film.
Quote:

"We wanted to show what soldiers encounter in modern warfare, whether it's in Somalia or Afghanistan," says Kathleen Carham Ross of the Army's public affairs office in Los Angeles.

Bruckheimer told the DOD when he was making "Pearl Harbor," another controversial historical film, that he was planning to make "Black Hawk." Before lending support, the Pentagon requested its usual early script review.

"We care if the project is historical, if it's accurate in its depiction of the Army," Ross says. "Obviously there are some scripts that, just by looking at, we know we can't support, like ones where the Army is in the employ of the Devil."

But the Army was already very familiar with Bowden's book, which is often used as a Special Forces training text. Before filming began, the Army trained actors with the 75th Ranger Regiment at Fort Benning, Ga., and in a commando program with the 7th Special Forces at Fort Bragg, N.C. Some went through the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment helicopter training program at Fort Campbell, Ky.

Boot-camp training for actors in war films is now de rigueur, but "Black Hawk" technical adviser Harry Humphries, a veteran of Bruckheimer's movies, said the training actors went through at Fort Benning and Fort Bragg was the most extensive he's ever seen.

Getting those 65-foot-long Black Hawks, pilots to fly them and guards to protect them in Morocco was a special operation in itself. Arranging for the deployment of arms, equipment and actual U.S. troops to establish what would be, to outward appearance, a working U.S. military base in Morocco for 92 days of filming meant intense negotiations involving the State Department, the Pentagon and the Moroccan Foreign Ministry.

Two down-to-the-wire days before the crucial "insertion" scene was to be filmed, two C-5 transport planes landed near Rabat carrying eight choppers (four Black Hawks and four Little Birds), pilots from the 160th SOAR and more than 100 soldiers from Bravo Company of the 75th Ranger Regiment's 3rd Battalion -- the same company that had fought in Mogadishu.

The bill from the Pentagon: $2.2 million, a small bite of the film's total $90 million budget. The money the studio paid covered the use of the equipment, choppers, transportation, maintenance and repair, as well as the troops' lodging and meals. "They even paid their laundry costs," Ross says.

And the actual military operation made us look like idiots. The movie made us look like scrappy badasses.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.