|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-12-2015, 02:36 PM | #15301 (permalink) |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Most fun flick I've seen in a while - Kingsman: The Secret Service
Seeing Colin Firth as a badass was great. They could have trimmed the last part of the movie a bit - scenes dragged on and it got redundant. And Samuel has played that same character a few too many times, but still a great flick.
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
06-12-2015, 08:27 PM | #15302 (permalink) | |
All day jazz and biscuits
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,354
|
Quote:
|
|
06-13-2015, 09:21 AM | #15303 (permalink) |
Out of Place
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: in an abstract house
Posts: 4,111
|
Finally saw Montage of heck and it disturbed me a little.
The doc was great but it ended in such a sad note, i was hoping for a more optimistic ending cause i dont want to pity Kurt's life or view him as a sad precautionary tale he was so much more than that. The film shows that in alot of scenes but right about the end sh*t becomes real sad, it was so obvious they wanted you to feel srry for him. I get that was the reality of the situation but for the film to end in such a negative way bothered me. Im not saying i wanted a happy ending all im sayin is despite his personal problems he was great artist that influenced alot of musicians and did alot of good and imo the film shoulda celebrated that in the end in appreciation of his memory.
__________________
"Hey Kids you got to meet the MIGHTY PIXIES!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbRbCtIgW3A |
06-13-2015, 10:18 AM | #15304 (permalink) |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Can't imagine how long it took to film that scene. I'm trying to think if there's ever been a more violent extended bit in any other movie and I can't come up with anything.
Spoiler for Spoiler:
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
06-15-2015, 09:12 PM | #15305 (permalink) |
Remember the underscore
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The other side
Posts: 2,488
|
Love and Mercy
I went in expecting more of a Beach Boys movie and less of a Brian Wilson movie. However, it basically tells two stories--the making of Pet Sounds and Brian's gradual descent into an emotional wreck, and Brian breaking free from the influence of his corrupt psychiatrist, Eugene Landy and meeting his future wife, Melinda. It was brilliant. I have never felt so emotionally drained after a movie. Every single actor was their character. The music, of course, speaks for itself. Highly recommended for anyone who likes The Beach Boys, or is interested in an uplifting story and romance. You won't be disappointed.
__________________
Everybody's dying just to get the disease |
06-15-2015, 10:58 PM | #15306 (permalink) |
Scuttle Buttin'
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Boulder Colorado
Posts: 972
|
I liked Love and Mercy quite a bit. My favorite parts by far were the scenes of Brian in the studio creating. I could watch an entire movie of just that. Mike Love came across as an ******* which aligns with what I have always heard. Great acting throughout, loved Giamati doing Landy.
|
06-15-2015, 11:40 PM | #15307 (permalink) |
All day jazz and biscuits
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,354
|
Jurassic World *Minor Spoiler* As I write this, over 200 million dollars has been spent over the weekend by people going to see Jurassic World. I'm curious as to what those people thought as they left the theater. Honestly, I have no idea what to think. Part of me thinks it was fun as **** and completely validates the enormous haul it took in over the weekend. Part of me thinks that it was atrocious and makes Jurassic Park 3 look like The Empire Strikes Back. Let's try to figure this one out together. There is a big difference between this film and the previous three. The park is open. The park is developed. The park has a **** ton of dinosaurs. The park is so big in fact that the 20,000 people that are currently on the island serve as a main motivation for figuring out how to fix the colossal mess that our smart and sophisticated characters have cooked up. Director Colin Trevorrow and the writing team had to figure out ways to include character development into a setting that also housed thousands of people. Honestly, they didn't do a bad job...with the main characters. The secondary characters however were misused so bad that I didn't care at all what happened to them. Claire, played by Bryce Dallas Howard, is introduced as a stuck up, out of touch with humanity workaholic that cares more about her job than her two nephews who are visiting the park. Her character, throughout the film, goes through a transformation that I feel was actually earned. Chris Pratt, who by the way was in the Navy if you didn't know after the 15th time they mentioned it, is a total badass. These two characters are perhaps the only characters in the entire film that I gave a sh*t about. The kids were poorly constructed cliches of boys of their age. The youngest is about 11 and if you didn't know...eleven year olds are REALLY into dinosaurs. The older one was about 16 and was so stereotypical teenager that the writer might have actually googled "what do teenagers do" when creating him. We'll get to the rest in a minute. There is a theme going on right now in Hollywood. Let's take a director that made a well regarded yet small indie sci-fi film and give them the reigns to a half a billion dollar mammoth of a budget. Josh Trank got Fantastic Four. Gareth Edwards got Godzilla. Rian Johnson got Star Wars. To me, this can either go two ways. You either get a film that has the aesthetics and characteristics of a new era or you get an over zealous attempt to try to join the ranks of superior films. I can't blame the directors really. It's like giving the best young go-kart driver the keys to an indy car. I feel that Colin Trevorrow, whole talented, was given the reigns to a franchise that he just wasn't ready for. I felt the film was trying WAY too hard to do too many things. Because he's a good director, he succeeded in some places. Other places he failed miserably. Let's see what he did right. The effects I'll admit. The effects in this were pretty awesome. Sure the sight of CGI dinosaurs was a bit distracting at first, but you got used to it and started to get a feel for why they had to be CGI. There were scenes in this film where you just couldn't use anything else but CGI. The action in this film was all over the place instead of precisely timed bursts. There were only a few scenes that slowed down enough for the SFX tea to use animatronics instead of computer generated dinosaurs. That being said, the action scenes were well done. The last battle was one of the best of the entire series and had me actually on the edge of my seat. All the dinosaurs were rendered beautifully and the film was actually pretty violent. One death scene in particular was especially gruesome. It involved basically being repeatedly dragged around and eaten by two dinosaurs. I'm shocked that got through the censors considering this film is rated PG-13. The SFX team did a great job. The acting This is a case where the efforts of few trumped the many. Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard knocked it out of the park. Chris Pratt should basically be in everything as far as I'm concerned. He's the Harrison Ford of this generation. He's funny, endearing, physically built, and just melts into every scene his is in so naturally that it draws you into the movie better. Bryce Dallas Howard's transformation towards the end won me over. I was reminiscent of Noomi Rapace in Prometheus where, once the **** starts to hit the fan, a true horror actress blossoms out of nothing. The dirtier Howard got in the film, the better and more believable she got. The rest of the cast was very meh, but I enjoyed the two leads so much that it didn't matter. Now let's get to my biggest gripe with the film, and ultimately the reason I didn't love the movie... The script The movie went from boring to "WHAT THE **** AM I WATCHING?" so fast that my head spun. There were so many peppered in jokes that weren't funny that I started to get embarrassed and covered my face. There were cliche kiss scenes, predictable dialogue, and the near cock tease of character development before an untimely death. I won't name the characters, but there are at least two that have completely unnecessary character development that leads straight to a death. You can't do that. That is Game of Thrones type **** that I get so frustrated with. I'm not saying you can't kill a character. I'm not saying that every character that dies has to have no back story. They way they did it in the film though, was just so silly. Let's just say that the same reason I hated Bane's death in The Dark Night Rises is the same gripe I have with the two main characters who die in this film. At least give them something special to go out on except a death scene cut right to another action piece. I also had a huge problem with how they used the raptors. *this might get spoiler-y* Raptors are feared dinosaurs in every single film about dinosaurs that has ever existed. This film treats them like dogs. It LITERALLY treats them like dogs, complete with obedience, loyalty, and feelings. I'm sorry, but Raptors don't have ****ing feelings. They don't get sentimental about a character who feeds them. Hell, if the film showed us that Chris Pratt raised these ****ers from birth it'd be one thing. The film made it a mission to point out that every single dinosaur on the island was genetically created and modified by scientists. These things should have only two functions, which actually gets pointed out in the film...eating, hunting, and ****ing. That's all. No ****ing memories of when Chris Pratt threw rats at us and used his clicker thingie to get us to chase goats. **** that. That's stupid. The fact that they actually have full on conversations with each other...and another specific dinosaur...is just stupid. I'm not talking about dinosaur language. I'm talking about literally at one point one dinosaur looks at another and says "thanks for fighting with me. It has been a pleasure" while the other dinosaur responds "the pleasure was all mine.". That's how it was shot. That's how it was conveyed. I literally threw my hands up and said aloud "what the **** is going on?" Look, I don't expect Scorsese or Kubrick when I go see a film about a dinosaur amusement park. The film was fun and was filled with action and Chris Pratt. That alone is worth your 13 dollars. I could not however get over the stupid jokes at inopportune times, the cliche "every Michael Bay has these" moments of dialogue and kiss scenes, and the complete misuse of terror inducing velocoraptors like they were dogs. Trevorrow seemed to change his mind constantly throughout the film about what kind of movie this was going to be. The plot was all over the place, trying to be funny one moment, while switching gears on a dime and expecting the audience to be terrified. It's a mess. Yet, the film is making a **** ton of money. There will be more. I hope they find good writers but as long as Chris Pratt is involved, I'll go see it. Also, Bryce Dallas Howard ran away from gigantic killing machines in heals. Enough said. 2.5/5 |
06-16-2015, 12:19 AM | #15308 (permalink) | ||
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Quote:
Spoiler for spoiler:
Seriously though, those films are nothing without Spielberg. Even 2, as dumb as it was at times, still had scenes that were highly memorable, whereas I will have trouble remembering anything from this one, just like I really can't remember a damned thing about 3. Spielberg knows how to make a cheesy creature feature into a legitimate horror movie. I mean, just about half the scenes in the first one are still iconic, just because of how he knew how to build and release tension. None of the other movies ever elevated themselves above B-movie-with-a-budget status. Another thing that none of the other movies have even tried to do, is capture that feeling of childlike wonder. Every time Alan Grant got that look on his face like a kid on Christmas morning, was just magic. I was about five or six when Jurassic Park came out, and it perfectly tapped into that part of every young boy's soul that just worships dinosaurs. It'll always be my fav Spielberg movie for that. Jaws can be as well made as it wants to be, but I never saw Jaws at least five times in a movie theater, just cause I couldn't convince my mother to see it any more times.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
06-16-2015, 09:33 AM | #15309 (permalink) |
silky smooth
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Pangaea
Posts: 4,079
|
I thought Jurassic World was excellent for the first half. The slow build up of little things just continuing to go wrong until the characters start to realize **** might SERIOUSLY hit the fan was awesome, and the shots of the amusement park were believable and fun. However right around when the kids were in the hamster ball it just started to plummet downhill for me with irrelevant subplots and bad twists with some really awful directing choices. It pissed me off when the four main characters were just standing around having a "moment"....all while there was mass hysteria all around them as flying dinosaurs are swooping down on innocent civilians and a giant killing machine was on its way to destroy the entire island. It almost felt like they switched directors at the halfway point for Michael Bay and just said "make some crazy **** happen and disregard logic or anything else"
|
|