EPOCH6

I guess what really makes the Academy Awards nominations so frustrating every single year is that we don't know the politics going down behind the scenes. If Selma is an astounding directorial accomplishment that swamps The Imitation Game in terms of talent and technicality (and I'm not saying it doesn't, as I said above I wouldn't argue with Selma snubbing Imitation Game for a nomination) then why didn't the highly accomplished voting directors nominate DuVernay instead? Is it because of her relatively small reputation and filmography? Shouldn't be, Morten Tyldum has an even smaller filmography. Is it for personal, racial, or political reasons? Or is it simply because The Imitation Game crew did a better job lobbying during the pre-Oscars season? I'm wondering the same thing for Gone Girl being snubbed from Adapted Screenplay and Original Music, or The Lego Movie being snubbed from Best Animated Film.

__________________

James

It's all about the lobbying, all of it. Paramount really ****ed up distributing Selma.
Although I do think politics play a part. Maybe The Academy don't feel comfortable rewarding a race centric film two years in a row. Maybe events in Ferguson and other places at least subconsciously meant the voters didn't want to award such a sensitive subject.

Overcast

Just watched Gummo. Instantly goes down as one of my favorites. I absolutely loved it.

Exo

Inherent Vice

PAUL THOMAS ANDERSON HAS A NEW FILM OUT! YES!

Being my favorite living director right now, I have been excited for this film while also actively avoiding anything related to the film. I wanted to go into this thing fresh. Turns out, it doesn’t matter how many times I watched the trailer or how many articles I read, I would have left the theater confused either way. I honestly have no clue what the hell happened in this film. Now, normally this would be a negative. Normally, this would be an indication that the screenplay was weak, disjointed, or too complex. That isn’t the case for this film. I heard and understood every single line of dialogue in the film. I just don’t know what most of it means. Sure, the film is complex and offers about a thousand different characters with their own connections with the story. Some of these characters appear in the beginning and disappear for two hours only to be revealed at the end as a major plot device. Some of these characters only grace their presence once and after the scene changes they’re gone. I don’t have a problem with too many characters. Hell, Magnolia is one of my favorite films of all time and there are just as many characters in that as this. What makes this such a hard watch is simple, we experience the film like our main protagonist Doc Sportello experiences it, in a very foggy haze. It’s this haze that makes things murky and confusing. There is nothing wrong with that in my mind. PTA has crafted a film that even he doesn’t understand. Seriously, he said that in an interview with Marc Maron. While I haven’t read the source material, he states that a lot of the films dialogue and story arc is just how Thomas Pynchon wrote it in his book. Pynchon, who is one of the most unique writers of the last thirty years, had his book translated into film beautifully by PTA. The only problem with that is how it affected the audience which was a mixed bag.

I had two reactions during the two and a half hour run length of the film. The first half I was actively trying to keep up with the story and understand everything that was happening. I wasn’t enjoying the film that much. I was frustrated that I couldn’t get a grasp on the significance of each character or that Joanna Newsome, who acted as the narrator of the film as well as a friend to Doc, would keep chiming in with Pynchon jargon. Don’t get me wrong, Newsome was great in this, and I liked the narration. It just didn’t help with the frustration of trying to figure out what’s going on. Halfway through the movie I decided to give up and just let the amazing cinematography, acting, and 70’s vibes wash over me. I should have done that from the beginning because I enjoyed the film so much more.

Joaquin Phoenix plays our protagonist Doc, a weed smoking private eye who is tasked to put this puzzle of a story in the right pieces. I’m not even sure if he does by the end or if everything that he went through was even real. PTA did a fantastic job of making the film feel like you just smoked a huge doober. The cast is overbearing at times. Del Toro, Short, Witherspoon, Wilson, and Roberts aren’t in the film enough. This is all Phoenix, Brolin, and Waterston. Josh Brolin plays Bigfoot, a longtime acquaintance of Doc and also the person who wants to see Doc arrested. Waterston plays Doc’s ex ladyfriend whom has gone missing. We see her in flashbacks and sporadically through the film but she’s incredible whenever we do. The last scene we see her in is especially impressive as it’s a long, almost seven minute take with just her and Doc talking, and then some. The comedy comes mostly from Brolin, Phoenix, and a hilarious Martin Short. The cast kicked ass is what I’m saying.

Obviously I’m going to have to see this again. Even if I wasn’t confused I would see it again given that it’s a film by a living, and young, legend of cinema. There’s just something about PTA’s films where these whole other chambers reveal themselves and open up on repeat viewings. This review is a lot shorter than what I expected a PTA review would be but honestly, I can’t talk much about what I don’t understand. I’ll say this though, there is literally nothing like a Paul Thomas Anderson film. It’s a strange, hypnotic, hysterical, haze of a film that demands repeat viewings and crackpot fan theories. There are scenes in this film that are bizarre and puzzling mixed in with scenes that are just flat out outrageous and funny. It’s always a fun time in the cinema with PTA.

Plus, I don’t mean to spoil anything, but at one point Josh Brolin tells Doc that he smells like a patchouli fart. That’s hilarious. Damn hippies.

4/5

__________________
LastFM

SUPREME POO BAH MODERATOR EXTRAORDINAIRE

Key

Cast Away

I don't think i've ever watched this movie and hated it. I've seen it at least 10 times, and it still stands to be one of the best Tom Hanks movies i've seen. It's also managed to keep a special spot in my top 5 favorite movies of all time. It's on Netflix if you've never seen it (though I don't see how that's possible), and I strongly recommend that you do see it.

Josef K

I saw Selma last night. I thought it was really good.

Psy-Fi

Venus in Furs (1969)

Dream-like erotic horror/thriller from director Jess Franco. Hadn't seen it for many years and had completely forgotten the ending (which was a good thing) so I thought I'd watch it again.

__________________

She's a Brick House

Justthefacts

This looks pretty sweet.

__________________
The Best Collection You'll See Today

Frownland

I watched The Adventures of Baron Munchausen last night and it was hilarious, as is to be expected of Gilliam.

__________________

Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Janszoon

Such a great movie, and pretty underrated among Gilliam movies.

__________________
A Night in the Life of the Invisible Man

Time & Place

25 Albums You Should Hear Before the Moon Crashes into the Earth and We All Die

last.fm