Wall-E was alright, but sitting there for an hour+ with no dialogue sucked.

Yeah, no.

I liked Wall-E. I wouldn't call it poetic brilliance, but I wouldn't call it boring either. As far as animation goes, the first half was amazing. The story overall was wonderful.

No it is just your opinion. Skulking around the lounge for a couple of nights and berating peoples opinions is hardly endearing for a new poster.

This is not what I would call a constructive post either.

http://www.takehollywood.com/core/me...graphy_152.jpg

Meehh, i watched it because i heard it was similar to High Fidelity, but the love stories and the music was nowhere near as endearing, and it was more of a cheese-fest.

http://www.iwatchstuff.com/2007/10/2...ood-poster.jpg

Finally got round to this, i've only seen a few films with Daniel Day Lewis in but every one of the characters he plays i like. Some really great imagery and some powerful moments.

:( Sowwy


I don't think I'd call your post on the matter constructive either. Have you got something against silent films? If you don't even have the patience to sit through 45 minutes of an animated film with no dialogue how do you sit through Chaplin or Eisenstein? Do their films suck because there's no words?

no but dont go to the movies to see "visual poetry" i go to see a good movie..and i just didnt get that from wall-e

I was pertaining to your one sentence post and not discussing silent films. I was just doing my job!

However I personally love the work of Murnau and Eisenstien's montage editing was revolutionary but not all film fans are into silent films.

exactly

http://www.popmatters.com/images/fil...rol-poster.jpg
Control - 9/10