Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Media (https://www.musicbanter.com/media/)
-   -   What's The Latest Film You Have Seen? (https://www.musicbanter.com/media/26687-whats-latest-film-you-have-seen.html)

Astronomer 04-24-2012 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoathsomePete (Post 1182255)
As is the case with every remake thus far of a horror film, yes. That said though, I've never really considered The Omen to be one of the more important horror films in the history of the genre.

Fair enough! I think I might give it a miss... doesn't sound like anything special!

Key 04-24-2012 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lateralus (Post 1182225)
I just watched this...

http://blog.mustard-berlin.com/wp-co...2/omen2006.jpg

But I fell asleep halfway through. Is it worth watching the whole thing? It seems pretty creepy... but it's gotten mostly terrible reviews.

I liked the remake, honestly. I'd say watch it just so that you can say you've seen it. It's worth a watch in my opinion.

Guybrush 04-25-2012 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoathsomePete (Post 1182255)
As is the case with every remake thus far of a horror film, yes. That said though, I've never really considered The Omen to be one of the more important horror films in the history of the genre.

So true. Although the remake of Fright Night surprised me in this regard. Not sure if it's better, but it's not as abysmally bad as they generally are.

I'm quite fond of the TV movie The Woman in Black from 1989. It's a very creepy ghost story about a lawyer Arthur Kitt who's job it is to inventorize or whatever it's called this mansion left behind by its recently dead owner. Of course there's something creepy going on there ..

Now there's a remake out with Daniel Radcliffe in the lead. From the old movie, you'd think a remake would have the potential to be a sophisticated, exciting film, but my knee-jerk assumption is they probably turned it to ****. I still may have to watch it though.

LoathsomePete 04-25-2012 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tore (Post 1182394)
So true. Although the remake of Fright Night surprised me in this regard. Not sure if it's better, but it's not as abysmally bad as they generally are.

I'm quite fond of the TV movie The Woman in Black from 1989. It's a very creepy ghost story about a lawyer Arthur Kitt who's job it is to inventorize or whatever it's called this mansion left behind by its recently dead owner. Of course there's something creepy going on there ..

Now there's a remake out with Daniel Radcliffe in the lead. From the old movie, you'd think a remake would have the potential to be a sophisticated, exciting film, but my knee-jerk assumption is they probably turned it to ****. I still may have to watch it though.

I've heard nothing but good things about The Woman in Black (2012), although I was not aware it was a TV movie, now I'm sad :(

Guybrush 04-25-2012 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoathsomePete (Post 1182441)
I've heard nothing but good things about The Woman in Black (2012), although I was not aware it was a TV movie, now I'm sad :(

Well, the original was. The remake is probably a regular cinema blockbuster. ;)

edit :

By the way, I liked the top review on imdb of the original :

Quote:

I've only seen this movie once in my life and have never forgotten it. I was thirteen years old and a teacher showed it in class on Halloween. I had to leave the classroom and have never, ever, forgotten the Woman in Black's face.

The big climax scene is beyond frightening, as can be expected, but I found the earlier scenes to be just as terrifying. The general tone of the film leaves you unsettled, even when nothing particularly scary is occurring. It is very, very subtle, but no other film has ever had quite such an effect on me.

If you think ghosts are scarier than slasher movies, I would definitely recommend this movie. Unless you hate being scared. In that case, don't ever watch this.
The reason I saw it the first time many, many years ago is because a friend of mine had a similar story to this. A teacher had shown them this film in the classroom when he was a kid. He was quite traumatized. :p:

jackhammer 04-25-2012 08:29 PM

Outside of Maniac, The original Omen still has the best head loss scene in cinema.

Astronomer 04-26-2012 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackhammer (Post 1182557)
Outside of Maniac, The original Omen still has the best head loss scene in cinema.

Really? Now that gives me a reason to check it out...

Howard the Duck 04-26-2012 01:33 AM

probably watching Cabin in the Woods this weekend

bob. 04-26-2012 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1182081)
Agreed, but the bigger questions for me were:

Spoiler for ...:

1. What was the actual situation above ground? Is it basically supposed to be our world and hardly anyone is aware of all this human sacrifice going on all over the place all the time? Or are most people aware of the sacrifices, but there's a certain percentage of the population that's bred to sacrificed and raised in a controlled, fictitious world where they are kept unaware?

2. It seemed like they were implying that someone had deliberately sabotaged the operation from the inside but this was never elaborated upon. Was it actually sabotaged? If so, by whom? I would have liked some explanation.


my two cents on these

Spoiler for spoiler:


1. i agree that such controlled environments would be one thing if it was one sacrifice....but yeah there are tons of them....what i would have kind of liked to see.....would be a little more background on the characters.....even a little 5-10 minute beginning where we could see what their actual personalities were like.....as its mentioned many times that their personalities have been altered

2. it was and it was by the stoner....saw this on second viewing


jackhammer gets 1000 points for even mentioning maniac....let alone the close range shot gun blast to the head :thumb:

LoathsomePete 04-26-2012 11:48 AM

http://images.moviepostershop.com/sw...1020193570.jpg

Swamp Thing (1982)

I've always been a fan of the comic and this movie came out right around the time Alan Moore started writing it and taking it in a slightly more complex direction with notions towards humanity, environmentalism, addiction, love, etc. Sadly this movie seems to be more geared towards the simple idea that Swamp Thing is just a monster who happens to be fighting for the good guys and it just doesn't work all that well. He and his female love interest are constantly besieged by the same grunt commandos because all he ever seems to do is knock them into the water. It's weird because Netflix has this rated as PG and I figured it was to make it accessible to kids... until the scene where Adrienne Barbeau swims naked in the swamp and you get to see her tits (they're awesome by the way). By the end it just devolves into a creature feature where enemy Arcane takes the same serum that made Alec Holland into the Swamp Thing and it turns into two guys in rubber suits attempting to fight while in thigh-high water.

I know I really shouldn't have expected much, but I really like Swamp Thing, and while this did come from a time when he was just a silly monster with the depth of a spoon, I do think there was some real potential here. If Marvel Studio's Avengers movie turns into a massive hit and the fear of trying to ape the complex continuity of comic books is banished, I really hope DC get their act together and create their own movie studio. Not only could they do a proper Swamp Thing movie, but they can also right the horrible wrong Warner Bros. did to John Constantine.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:30 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.