Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Media (https://www.musicbanter.com/media/)
-   -   What are you reading right now? (https://www.musicbanter.com/media/19733-what-you-reading-right-now.html)

Monita Bonita 01-31-2009 01:44 AM

im reading Hye on Rye

Guybrush 01-31-2009 04:45 AM

I've been a fan of Sir Terry Pratchett for many years and I've read all his Discworld books at least twice, most three or more times.

Now I'm enjoying Hogfather for the nth time. :p

adidasss 01-31-2009 05:03 AM

Oh I downloaded those...will check them out soonish, even though I'm a little suspicious when it comes to such lenghty series...:\

OT: Haruki Murakami - Norwegian wood

Guybrush 01-31-2009 05:13 AM

There are several series within the Discworld series (The watch, the witches, Tiffany Aching, Moist Von Lipwig) and there are several stand-alone books as well, so .. the entry points are many. :)

You don't have to start with the Colour of Magic, his first book which I'll admit I consider rather weak compared to many of his others. I would suggest you start with perhaps .. Going postal, Guards! Guards!, Wyrd Sisters, The Wee Free Men ..

Books like Soul Music, Mort, Reaper Man, Pyramids, Small Gods, Monstrous Regiment and The Truth would also work as entry points, although some of these do have characters in them that appear in earlier books.

Terrible Lizard 01-31-2009 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepy jack (Post 588208)
1984 is far more significant and important than anything Bradbury ever produced. How is it even a dry read? Because it isn't flowery Updikesque bullshit or what?

The film had no visceral style to it, Orwell was all ideas and no execution.
No real charm or pleasure in reading it, just simple and dry.

The theme and implications of 1984 are timeless true enough, but Bradbury is a better writer. I guess enjoyment in the process of storytelling is something you tight-ass literary elite pricks, wouldn't know **** about. :usehead:

I suggest a healthy helping of Edgar Rice Burroughs, Miyazki, and Tezuka.

And Ethan, John Updike hasn't been dead that long, show the man some respect asswipe.

ProggyMan 01-31-2009 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terrible Lizard (Post 588315)
The film had no visceral style to it, Orwell was all ideas and no execution.
No real charm or pleasure in reading it, just simple and dry.

The theme and implications of 1984 are timeless true enough, but Bradbury is a better writer. I guess enjoyment in the process of storytelling is something you tight-ass literary elite pricks, wouldn't know **** about. :usehead:
.

He has a pretty distinctive writing style actually...

anticipation 01-31-2009 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss (Post 588237)
Oh I downloaded those...will check them out soonish, even though I'm a little suspicious when it comes to such lenghty series...:\

OT: Haruki Murakami - Norwegian wood

yes!

cardboard adolescent 01-31-2009 01:28 PM

The Book of Chuang Tzu... pretty sweet.

jackhammer 01-31-2009 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terrible Lizard (Post 588315)
The film had no visceral style to it, Orwell was all ideas and no execution.
No real charm or pleasure in reading it, just simple and dry.

The theme and implications of 1984 are timeless true enough, but Bradbury is a better writer. I guess enjoyment in the process of storytelling is something you tight-ass literary elite pricks, wouldn't know **** about. :usehead:

I suggest a healthy helping of Edgar Rice Burroughs, Miyazki, and Tezuka.

And Ethan, John Updike hasn't been dead that long, show the man some respect asswipe.


Quit the name calling please. It is possible to have heated arguments without making derogatory comments.

sleepy jack 01-31-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terrible Lizard (Post 588315)
The film had no visceral style to it, Orwell was all ideas and no execution.
No real charm or pleasure in reading it, just simple and dry.

The theme and implications of 1984 are timeless true enough, but Bradbury is a better writer. I guess enjoyment in the process of storytelling is something you tight-ass literary elite pricks, wouldn't know **** about. :usehead:

I suggest a healthy helping of Edgar Rice Burroughs, Miyazki, and Tezuka.

And Ethan, John Updike hasn't been dead that long, show the man some respect asswipe.

I didn't even know Updike died recently; either way you missed my point. Good writing is about ideas (after all this is what a story is) not about flowery descriptions and overusing metaphors. The point I was getting at with Updike is he IS all execution (and the quality of his execution is one that's up for debate) and as a result of this not a very good writer. But hey if phrases like "groaning concussions" and "tinkling shivers" make stories appear well-written to you than whatever, have fun with your imagery wanking.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.