IamAlejo

That's where it came from.

Also, where I can see the USS Cole being a naval ship out on patrol in a region of the world where we were at war/preparing for war being misused as a word for terrorism, I disagree with the Norfolk Naval Shipyard arguement.

I guess you could make the argument of it as an "act of war", but isn't terrorism an act of war as well. You could make the statement that all people are potential recruits for the military, so that when they flew the plane into the buildings they were simply trying to kill potential recruits.

Again, see where you're/the author is coming from, but can't say I agree with it.

Also, I used the Naval base argument as an example since I live right by it. There are multiple areas that could be used for terrorism, i.e. Atlanta, Nuclear Power Plants, etc.

__________________

a man, a plan, a canal, panama

TheBig3

Would you consider the bombing of pearl harbor terrorism or the first strike in war? Must countries always declare war before they engage in it?

And by the way, like the man or not, its irrefutible that when John Kerry said "The president has left nuclear power plants unguarded and unprotected" that he wasn't lying.

The bottom line is, regardless of whether or not there are area for attacks in the US. Bush didn't do a ****ing thing about it, and so I'd reitterate, no one in the red states cares about Terrorism to the degree of facts. If they listened they'd be aware that Bush (for them) was terrible on defence and if they really cared about terrorism they'd have voted on it.

I'd also like to throw in here that my views are moderate and im none to pleased with the current mind set that being republican means your anti *** marrige/abortion.

Thats how this administration gets votes. Where has your fiscal responsibility gone Elephant. Republicans would do very well not to elect Bill Frist...the mans a moron.

__________________
I've moved to a new address