The Relationship Thread - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-22-2020, 02:58 PM   #241 (permalink)
SGR
No Ice In My Bourbon
 
SGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwb View Post
I don't remember much about him except that he didn't like me

So therefore **** that chomo
Who? Urban?
SGR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2020, 03:04 PM   #242 (permalink)
jwb
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk View Post
even if we had a clear understanding of the genetic code for height / we do not know when or why it became a part of our sequencing. Chimp stage lemur stage sea cucumber stage a bizarre mix of all kinds of **** ???

Just saying women prefer taller dudes cased closed is straight out of my own playbook- you making it about rape and hunter gatherers is a gross simplistic explanation.

There might be a genetic advantage to something else that causes women to be shorter as a side effect. There might might might be an endless ****loads of mights. Having a theory that sounds reasonable doesn’t constitute proof.

Regarding consent ... do ladybugs consent? When I’m saying consent may be irrelevant I’m talking way back before hunter gatherers. Before homosapiens. Maybe before there were trees to chimp out in. We don’t know.
bruh... Come on. Stop obfuscating. I didn't say women prefer taller men case closed. I said women are the selective partner in human sexuality and so the fact that men are taller than women is most plausibly explained by sexual selection. You've yet to give a coherent counter point other than maybe tall rapists are more proficient than short rapists.

Since it seems like such a stretch for you with the height thing... Do you use the same logic with regard to birds? You doubt the females are selecting mates with colorful patterns?
jwb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2020, 03:05 PM   #243 (permalink)
jwb
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundgardenRocks View Post
Who? Urban?
yea OH ninja posted me other wise I would've quoted you lol
jwb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2020, 03:26 PM   #244 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwb View Post
bruh... Come on. Stop obfuscating. I didn't say women prefer taller men case closed. I said women are the selective partner in human sexuality and so the fact that men are taller than women is most plausibly explained by sexual selection. You've yet to give a coherent counter point other than maybe tall rapists are more proficient than short rapists.

Since it seems like such a stretch for you with the height thing... Do you use the same logic with regard to birds? You doubt the females are selecting mates with colorful patterns?
I think you misconstrued my reach advantage fist comment. I mean knocking out the other male competition. The consent portion was talking about pre-human **** which I tried to clarify.

No the bird thing is a lock. But how and why and when that came to be is a different discussion. Still though, it happens, there’s an evolutionary cause, and it perpetuates a distinction so point taken.

It’s not incumbent on me to offer a counter as to why men are taller because I’m saying we don’t know.

Even if we establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that modern women like dudes over 6”2 better than dudes under 5”7 that’s just a clue. Most sociobiological answers to questions have a wonderful advantage of being intuitive but just having a theory or a hypothesis is only the very first stage of the scientific process. And when it comes to genetics and the history of the genome it’s complicated af. Ideas that seem like they carry weight because it’s just common sense often don’t pan out under scientific scrutiny.

That’s all I got on this one.
__________________

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion

Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND:

https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html

OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2020, 03:29 PM   #245 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundgardenRocks View Post
I'm married. And Hawk will be happy to know that I'm planning on having kids.

Also - didn't know that about Urban and the underage girls. That's disappointing. He was a cynical bastard. He was also a dick. I didn't mind him, and I got a lot of great music recommendations from him.
Yeah I figured. Just don’t **** it up with your wife even if you have to make big sacrifices.

Goddamn Urban is going down without much evidence. ****ing witch trials in this bitch.
__________________

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion

Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND:

https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html

OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2020, 03:33 PM   #246 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Steph might be a bit manipulative at times but I've never known her to be that kind of liar so I'm willing to trust her judgement.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2020, 03:51 PM   #247 (permalink)
county fair energy
 
WWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Steph might be a bit manipulative at times but I've never known her to be that kind of liar so I'm willing to trust her judgement.
Tell me more about this
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
I know what real life is, I've been living in it for well over a decade
Quote:
Originally Posted by jadis View Post
WWWP is pretty but should be cancelled (digital blackface)

#DEMODFROWNLAND
#TERMLIMITSFORMODERATORS
WWWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2020, 04:02 PM   #248 (permalink)
jwb
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk View Post
I think you misconstrued my reach advantage fist comment. I mean knocking out the other male competition. The consent portion was talking about pre-human **** which I tried to clarify.

No the bird thing is a lock. But how and why and when that came to be is a different discussion. Still though, it happens, there’s an evolutionary cause, and it perpetuates a distinction so point taken.

It’s not incumbent on me to offer a counter as to why men are taller because I’m saying we don’t know.

Even if we establish beyond a shadow of a doubt that modern women like dudes over 6”2 better than dudes under 5”7 that’s just a clue. Most sociobiological answers to questions have a wonderful advantage of being intuitive but just having a theory or a hypothesis is only the very first stage of the scientific process. And when it comes to genetics and the history of the genome it’s complicated af. Ideas that seem like they carry weight because it’s just common sense often don’t pan out under scientific scrutiny.

That’s all I got on this one.
We're gonna have to agree to disagree. The bird thing is a lock but not the human thing. Maybe we just don't like to look at ourselves in that way even though we're comfortable doing it with other species.
jwb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2020, 04:02 PM   #249 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Steph might be a bit manipulative at times but I've never known her to be that kind of liar so I'm willing to trust her judgement.
I agree she’s honest. I agree his privacy should be respected. I’m not jumping to any conclusions about the egregiousness of what actually occurred though. I can imagine a huge spectrum of possibilities there from ridiculing their tastes to untoward **** off the board. I object to interacting with minors in chats and ****. And that goes to friending them on Facebook or any of that ****. That goes for any adult unless you’re related. It’s bad form.
__________________

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion

Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND:

https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html

OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2020, 04:05 PM   #250 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

Quote:
Maybe we just don't like to look at ourselves in that way even though we're comfortable doing it with other species.
Dude. You can’t out “we’re just another organism” me.
__________________

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion

Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND:

https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html

OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.