|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Your verdict on the MW monument | |||
Take it down now |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 60.00% |
Not great, but OK by me |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 40.00% |
Looks nice to me |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
A worthy monument to MW |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |||
carpe musicam
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
|
![]() Quote:
Here is another statue I like. The dress looks futuristic. It'a like Marie Curie step through time presenting to us that she holds the mystery of the atom. Monument to Maria Sklodowska-Curie ![]() Quote:
To me it looks a like a trophy with a marble base, abstract art as a riser, and female figure. The whole thing akin to an Oscar award. Between the figure and the base is a strange bit of abstract art that begs to be interpreted. Is it a burning bush with smoke rising? Perhaps a retelling of the Phoenix where the hatched egg burns and rising out of the smoke comes a female figure? Maybe it is suppose to represent an ovary and the figure stands atop a Fallopian tube? Who knows what was running through the mind of the artist when she made the statue. The MW memorial figure departs from concepts found in classic art like e.g. Venus De Milo. The figure's hips are less curvaceous, the stance more rigid than Venus DM. There was this sense of combining sensuality and modesty in classic art. Statues and paintings of females usually present women partially bare, with either long hair or clothing obscuring the more revealing parts. The MW memorial is less sensual however more revealing - baring the woo woo for all to see. I guess that is most contravention part of the memorial. One thing to take into consideration is that third wave feminism (maybe not all but some do) take pride and see nudity (stripping, pole dancing etc) as empowering. There is a sort of an irony to that where first wave feminist fought not to be treated like a sex object. The whole things seems more like the artist's ode to feminism more than a memorial honouring MW.
__________________
Quote:
![]() "it counts in our hearts" ?ºº? “I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac. “If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle. "If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon "I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | ||
...here to hear...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: He lives on Love Street
Posts: 4,444
|
![]()
Quite literally, *googles pareidolia*: that's an impressive word to have at your disposal!
One reason we've disscussed the MW statue at such length is that it seems to embody or lead into a bunch of intriguing-for-some questions:- The history of feminism. Do female nudes celebrate women, or send a message that they are vulnerable/available? How do we represent the past? To what extent should public art, like statues, educate, shock or entertain us? But as Elph indicates, a lot has been said about just one statue, which is why I'm grateful that Neapolitan noticed the other half of my thread title: Statues of Women, and showed us a couple of others :- Quote:
__________________________________________________ _______________ 150 years after Mary W, in the 1920s, Margaret Sanger was promoting birth control as a road to freedom and equality for women in the USA and became the founder of the controvertial Planned Parenthood organisation - so controvertial that: Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
"Am I enjoying this moment? I know of it and perhaps that is enough." - Sybille Bedford, 1953 Last edited by Lisnaholic; 11-14-2020 at 07:06 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|