|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Your verdict on the MW monument | |||
Take it down now |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 60.00% |
Not great, but OK by me |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 40.00% |
Looks nice to me |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
A worthy monument to MW |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
![]()
Ask the imaginary person in your brain who's making that point.
Anyways, media wasn't prominent enough in Wollenstonecraft's time for exclusively sexualized representation in media to be on her mind imo. That said, she did view being defined by beauty as inherently restrictive, but I'm not sure if that was the intent here. The artist did it to represent femininity, they did so in a way that's far from the unrealistic standards of barbie dolls (unless they're much more toned down over in the UK), and it could've been done better but to me this just reeks of manufactroversy.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
![]() |
![]() |
|