Coronavirus: COVID-19 - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2021, 07:22 PM   #3781 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundgardenRocks View Post
So the lab leak origin theory is now getting mainstream attention again.

Somewhat strange that a year ago, you could be censored on social media for humoring the idea and much of the media at large would label you a conspiracy theorist or a peddler of misinformation for supporting the idea.
They'll probably censor reports that it was an american bioterrorist attack on china.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 07:24 PM   #3782 (permalink)
SGR
No Ice In My Bourbon
 
SGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
They'll probably censor reports that it was an american bioterrorist attack on china.
Instead of reverting to cynicism and muddying the waters with baseless hypotheticals, care to share your take on its origin?
SGR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 07:25 PM   #3783 (permalink)
Certified H00d Classic
 
Anteater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bernie Sanders's yacht
Posts: 6,129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exo View Post
It still wouldn't have made him give a sh*t about it ravaging the country. Or would it? If it meant sh*tting on China, would more Americans have taken the lockdown and mask wearing more seriously?
120% yes.
__________________
Anteater's 21 Fav Albums Of 2020

Anteater's Daily Tune Roulette

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
I was called upon by the muses for greatness.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
I'm bald, ja.
Anteater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 07:29 PM   #3784 (permalink)
Exo
All day jazz and biscuits
 
Exo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anteater View Post
120% yes.
That's sad yo.
__________________
LastFM

SUPREME POO BAH MODERATOR EXTRAORDINAIRE
Exo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 07:30 PM   #3785 (permalink)
SGR
No Ice In My Bourbon
 
SGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exo View Post
It still wouldn't have made him give a sh*t about it ravaging the country. Or would it? If it meant sh*tting on China, would more Americans have taken the lockdown and mask wearing more seriously?
Trump did care about it ravaging the country. It was an election year. Purely out of self-interest, he had to have cared. Whether his caring amounted to effective policy is obviously a different question.

I don't think that any investigation at the time could've proven the origin of COVID one way or the other. The situation would've likely gone done in much the same manner that it did in reality. Let's be honest, if Obama was still in office, Republicans would've been even more resistant to wearing masks - probably saying dumb **** like "The communist muslim-in-chief is trying to institute Sharia law!".

The point of trying to determine its origin now is to learn what caused it and adjust accordingly to prevent it from occuring in the future. Whether that means changes/regulations to wet markets or changes/stricter regulations to viral research.
SGR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 07:32 PM   #3786 (permalink)
Exo
All day jazz and biscuits
 
Exo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundgardenRocks View Post
Trump did care about it ravaging the country. It was an election year. Purely out of self-interest, he had to have cared. Whether his caring amounted to effective policy is obviously a different question.
Were you, like, not around last year or something?
__________________
LastFM

SUPREME POO BAH MODERATOR EXTRAORDINAIRE
Exo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 07:36 PM   #3787 (permalink)
SGR
No Ice In My Bourbon
 
SGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exo View Post
Were you, like, not around last year or something?
Yeah, in fact I was. Some policies and initiatives worked, others didn't. A whole lot of people died as a result.

Trump gets credit for Operation Warp Speed and the hastened pace of vaccine development and a small amount of credit for shutting off travel from China early (it should've been earlier, but he got a lot of criticism at the time).

Everything else that went wrong falls on Trump's lap, de facto, as he was the President at the time ("the buck stops here" and all). That's one of the big reasons he lost the election.
SGR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 07:46 PM   #3788 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundgardenRocks View Post
Instead of reverting to cynicism and muddying the waters with baseless hypotheticals, care to share your take on its origin?
Can't revert to something you introduced dawg. My theory is that if it's found to be of lab origin, it was introduced by the u.s. government to destabilize china. donny is also known for projection so him introducing the accusation pretty early on doesn't help.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 08:00 PM   #3789 (permalink)
SGR
No Ice In My Bourbon
 
SGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
Can't revert to something you introduced dawg. My theory is that if it's found to be of lab origin, it was introduced by the u.s. government to destabilize china. donny is also known for projection so him introducing the accusation pretty early on doesn't help.
I still think you're being cynical/contrarian, but if not, you must think the US is completely incompetent.

US introduces virus to China to destabilize the country.

Chinese deaths: ~4,000
US deaths: ~ 600,000



Personally, I don't think we'll ever know for sure what the origin was, given China's resistance to cooperate in efforts to do so.

As an aside, I think Tom Cotton was the first Republican to make claims of lab origin. Trump used it to embolden his hawkish policy towards China, despite the uncertain truthfulness of the claim. Many were turned off on the idea of lab origin given Trump's support of it.

Last edited by SGR; 05-29-2021 at 08:07 PM.
SGR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2021, 08:13 PM   #3790 (permalink)
SOPHIE FOREVER
 
Frownland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoundgardenRocks View Post
I still think you're being cynical/contrarian, but if not, you must think the US is completely incompetent.

US introduces virus to China to destabilize the country.

Chinese deaths: ~4,000
US deaths: ~ 600,000
It's possible for americans to be dumb dumbs yes. *gestures at forum* Their propaganda machine allows them some room for sloppiness though.

If you trust China's statistics, you have a solid gotcha there.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Frownland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.