Coronavirus: COVID-19

OccultHawk · 05-05-2020, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre

What should be spread is those lips around my ding dong.

lulzzz

**Frownland** · 05-05-2020, 07:51 PM

Just put on your Thinking Hats fellas

Lucem Ferre · 05-05-2020, 07:55 PM

Womp womp is probably the noise of you gagging as you deep throat my ding dong.

Anteater · 05-05-2020, 08:00 PM

It is certainly nice to know that quite a few of you trust big pharma at face value over actual scientists with decades of experience and credibility. Especially after the debacle a few pages back when we discussed the actual composition of the virus and what scientists had to say about it.

Is it because she's a woman?

Lucem Ferre · 05-05-2020, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anteater

It is certainly nice to know that quite a few of you trust big pharma at face value over actual scientists with decades of experience and credibility. Especially after the debacle a few pages back when we discussed the actual composition of the virus and what scientists had to say about it.

Is it because she's a woman?

I didn't watch the video. But I did read the article and I can tell you with certainty that she, and you, are completely jumping the gun because everything in that article says there isn't any sufficient data to prove that it does cause any disease interference. Something clearly said. There is a suggested hypothesis that it may cause people to catch things in the coronavirus family.

Then this article filled with multiple scientists confirmed everything I thought and explained better why it's incomplete data with things I didn't even think of.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/no...k-of-covid-19/

Maybe it's because I went through these studies before when looking up the non existent link between soy and testosterone reduction, but it's pretty sad that you have to get schooled on how to comprehend scientific data from a high school drop out.

Now suck my ding dong.

Anteater · 05-05-2020, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre

I didn't watch the video. But I did read the article and I can tell you with certainty that she, and you, are completely jumping the gun because everything in that article says there isn't any sufficient data to prove that it does cause any disease interference. Something clearly said. There is a suggested hypothesis that it may cause people to catch things in the coronavirus family.

Then this article filled with multiple scientists confirmed everything I thought and explained better why it's incomplete data with things I didn't even think of.

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/no...k-of-covid-19/

Maybe it's because I went through these studies before when looking up the non existent link between soy and testosterone reduction, but it's pretty sad that you have to get schooled on how to comprehend scientific data from a high school drop out.

Good article. But it doesn't account for the timeline she mentioned in regards to the vaccinations they got in Italy prior to the coronavirus outbreak nor the age group. The elderly in general don't have great immune systems to begin with. Virus interference would explain how they became particularly vulnerable when we didn't see explosions quite like that in other parts of Europe at the same time. Also, Oxford did a study on virus interference that demonstrated that (in general) they saw an increased risk of "Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections" as a result of influenza vaccination within certain time periods.

Lucem Ferre · 05-05-2020, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anteater

Good article. But it doesn't account for the timeline she mentioned in regards to the vaccinations they got in Italy prior to the coronavirus outbreak nor the age group. The elderly in general don't have great immune systems to begin with. Virus interference would explain how they became particularly vulnerable when we didn't see explosions quite like that in other parts of Europe at the same time.

Didn't watch the video. Probably don't need to ta know that she's most likely jumping to a conclusion that doesn't have sufficient data to prove.

9 times out of ten if they are dishonestly interpreting studies or articles or statistics or any kind of information at any point they will continue to misrepresent things or push that same dishonest narrative.

Doing more research on this girl, and she has a history of doing this. I history of dishonestly interpreting statistics to push an anti-vaxxer agenda. The only way you can take her seriously is if you think there is some massive conspiracy to silence her. You're in tinfoil area now.

I don't even want you to suck my ding dong now. That's a privilege you lost.

OccultHawk · 05-05-2020, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anteater

It is certainly nice to know that quite a few of you trust big pharma at face value over actual scientists with decades of experience and credibility. Especially after the debacle a few pages back when we discussed the actual composition of the virus and what scientists had to say about it.

Is it because she's a woman?

I tried a similar trick trying to play it off like Wolf was being homophobic...

Didn’t work for me neither

**Frownland** · 05-05-2020, 08:10 PM

Lol good one

Anteater · 05-05-2020, 08:12 PM

Ready to surf on the 5th wave of feminism.

05-05-2020, 07:51 PM	#2 (permalink)
Frownland SOPHIE FOREVER Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: East of the Southern North American West Posts: 35,541	Just put on your Thinking Hats fellas __________________ Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. d e a f b o x

05-05-2020, 08:10 PM	#9 (permalink)
Frownland SOPHIE FOREVER Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: East of the Southern North American West Posts: 35,541	Lol good one __________________ Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. d e a f b o x