Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Paris: balanced, symmetric, with windows that match the age of the building style Iowa: a clumsy cut and paste of different elements; one pyramid turret roof, one conical, both squeezed uncomfortably against the pitched roof behind. The main facade looks a mess to me: there's no consistant rhythm to the horizontal spacing of the windows; they and the smooth horizontal bands above them look like they come from a different era from the "historical" style attempted elsewhere. |
Quote:
With the Paris building, you could slice it down the middle, erase one side, and then mirror the remaining side and it'd be exactly what we see now. |
Yep, you're right, Plankton.
What surprised me (thanx wiki) is that the Iowa building dates from 1895: I thought it was a much more modern pastiche. They apparently got a local architect to design it, which is in itself a good idea, but imo he wasn't really up to the job. |
I did see dates and names of archy's, but I was more interested in the material used, which was Sandstone for both, which Ohio Berea being listed for the Iowa building. I was curious if it was limestone from around here like quite a few buildings.
Ross appears to have a few other notable works as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_W...Iowa_architect) |
Quote:
I understand the windows a little off and not as nice as the Paris building but it's still nice... https://boxden.com/smilies/v9jPCe4.png |
Of course, Mindfulness! It's only my opinion. Two things I like about the building: (i) the colour of the stone and (ii) the central tower with the clocks on it.
I would hate to put you off from posting more "small city" stuff as I really enjoy this thread. |
Quote:
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:45 AM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.