Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
Gates represents something that actually hurts you. I’ve never been able to visualize any kind of solution that doesn’t hit a wall caused by overpopulation. Any type of utopian vision I can dream up only allows for a few million people. The there’s too ****ing many of us problem ****s up everything. Look, really what we need is tribal anarchism. Space to do our own thing. That means billions need to leave the ****ing planet. I can’t get around that. Actually that really doesn’t waver in my mind. For instance, I always felt the Burmese were right to run off those Muslims. Myanmar is not an intrusive country. They got their space carved out in the world. It’s established. They have a right to it. When they stood their ground and drove those people out I felt like they were doing the entire world a favor. You wanna live in Myanmar? Start by being Burmese. It doesn’t apply to the United States though. The USA shouldn’t exist and I’ve remained steady on that belief as well.
|
The only thing I can see that can deal with this problem is nuclear holocaust. There simply is no alternative possible. Nobody is going to enact any kind of policy that reduces human population, probably at all, but certainly not to any meaningful degree. And so you're left with a nuclear war.
And a nuclear war will not lead to tribal anarchism. It will simply lead to a reduced population everywhere. There would still be muslims in Burma. Just less of them. Like there would be less "traditional Burmese".
There would still be blacks in the US, just less of them. There would still be Muslims in Europe, just less of them. There would still be whites in South Africa, just less of them. Just as there would be less "traditional" races in those same places.
?
Demographic shift isn't something that you can deal with without advocating for actively fascist policies and then you'd have to prove that those policies would be both implementable and sustainable.
Linear Mode
