Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   The Lounge (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/)
-   -   Sexual Misconduct Pool (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/90587-sexual-misconduct-pool.html)

The Batlord 10-01-2018 07:01 PM

.

Frownland 10-01-2018 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 2001667)
i never ****ed (raped) a passed out woman

I never rushed a **** or put it in in a hurry

I’ve picked up drunk chicks and bars because they were women who wanted to drink and get laid

I have never, not ever once, rushed or pushed a woman into intercourse

No woman has ever had to tell me no twice

Y’all can **** off with that bull****

I don’t and never have pushed the boundaries of consent in any way ever

That’s a serious matter of honor

Did you dry hump any rich chicks though?

Zhanteimi 10-01-2018 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by occulthawk (Post 2001667)
i’ve picked up drunk chicks and bars because they were women who wanted to drink and get laid

hub?

OccultHawk 10-01-2018 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 2001671)
Did you dry hump any rich chicks though?

Nope


Cuthbert 10-02-2018 12:16 PM

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45712777

The BBC are reporting on this now. Case reopened by Las Vegas police.

Ronaldo needs to explain that statement.

The Batlord 10-02-2018 12:23 PM

Regardless of what you think about a woman accepting money for a non-disclosure agreement for a sexual assault the idea that such an agreement should ever be legally binding is disgusting. It absolutely should not be legal to enter into a legally binding contract to say that a crime can not be discussed publicly to protect the perpetrator.

If that means a woman can take a rapist for a million dollars and then out him anyway then **** it. Rapists should always be open to prosecution.

Contrarian1 10-02-2018 01:56 PM

I'm surprised Arnold Schwarzenegger hasn't had any claims against him (Steven Segal and Sly Stallone have already been accused)

I'll say Arnold.

OccultHawk 10-02-2018 02:19 PM

I won’t talk if you pay me is the same as I will talk if you don’t pay me which is blackmail. Therefore, all rape victims that accept a non-disclosure agreement should be prosecuted. That way they can imprison more people because hooray for government and nothing says “I’m being governed” more distinctly than being incarcerated. Plus, busy prisons are a goldmine for corrupt politicians! Rock the Vote: 2018! Beto or Bust!!! USA! Long live the panopticon! Love ya, Bernie!

The Batlord 10-02-2018 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 2001804)
I won’t talk if you pay me is the same as I will talk if you don’t pay me which is blackmail. Therefore, all rape victims that accept a non-disclosure agreement should be prosecuted. That way they can imprison more people because hooray for government and nothing says “I’m being governed” more distinctly than being incarcerated. Plus, busy prisons are a goldmine for corrupt politicians! Rock the Vote: 2018! Beto or Bust!!! USA! Long live the panopticon! Love ya, Bernie!

Translation: I **** drunk bitches and don't like it when women make an issue of that kind of thing.

Paedantic Basterd 10-02-2018 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 2001790)
Regardless of what you think about a woman accepting money for a non-disclosure agreement for a sexual assault the idea that such an agreement should ever be legally binding is disgusting. It absolutely should not be legal to enter into a legally binding contract to say that a crime can not be discussed publicly to protect the perpetrator.

If that means a woman can take a rapist for a million dollars and then out him anyway then **** it. Rapists should always be open to prosecution.

Church.


Just like how you can't consent to being murdered. It's not a business matter, it's an ethical one.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.