OccultHawk |
12-13-2019 01:03 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy
(Post 2094785)
An issue I’ve found with this is that, at least where I live, Spanish is not even offered until like 8th grade at the earliest. I think that’s too late. A foreign language is required to graduate high school, but all that most people do is take the bare minimum to graduate and then forget basically everything after high school. I’m one of those people too, even. There’s quite a bit more even to my journey with foreign languages...ugh..., but the point is that it needs to be introduced at a younger age. The research overwhelmingly suggests that learning a language is easier when you start as young as possible too
|
It's definitely well understood that in order to acquire native speaker fluidity you must learn as a child. However, that type of ability to navigate a second language is only developed by immersion and neccessity or in educational environments that are only available to very few Americans.
In Japan, I taught many 7th graders with no prior knowledge in classes with kids who had been studying with native speakers since they were three. By 8th grade the achievement gap was usually completely closed. My conclusion was that investing heavily in foreign language during the elementary years wields poor returns.
I think it’s kind of like algebra. If you push a kid hard as hell he might be able to do it in 6th or 7th grade but if you wait until 9th and 10th grade the same kid can learn algebra with much less effort.
Learning a foreign language is great and highly beneficial (like jwb pointed out) from a cognitive standpoint. Unfortunately, mandating it across the American curriculum would be a poor use of resources.
Re: evolution - lol @ anyone who thinks it’s being taught in Jesusland.
|