It's actually Christophe, which is much more ***gy.

christophe makes me cringe, you should change your legal name to Frownland.

You're just jealous that you can't relate to the antagonist of The Truman Show.

.

ChristoPhrownland

The Frown of Montechristophe

If it weren't for the Christophers, it would be. Cultural appropriation is real, people. Think of the Richard/Rick/Patrick dilemma.

This is better. Be this. Deed poll it now.

Are you sure it's pretentious enough?

Plank:

http://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-conten...tizen_kane.gif

.

Any time anyone gets Batty's panties in a twist, it's a successful troll indeed.

The toilet has been flushed, and I just wiped.

You are a beautiful person, Plank.

wait what just happened

Let's bring him back. He's more fun to troll when actually present.

my avatar became instantly less funny

I asked for mine to be changed too.

To be fair, it was never that funny to begin with.

You banned him? For what: getting upset about your thread? :confused:

I'm leaving mine in memory of our fallen memelord

^got a point. On the other hand, is it actually entrapment when the authority does it??

I'm with Plank.

#standwithplank

What's Batty's hashtag then?

#walktheplank

He doesn't deserve one.

ffs, im not posting until my avatar is changed. i cant stand looking at it.

No I don't agree. If there was no good reason to ban him (and I know Plankton is a fair guy so I assume there was) then this spat should not have been enough to get him banned. It was setup to annoy him, after all, so why be surprised if he snapped at it? If that is the reason, I have to say I find that very unfair. That's like Frown banning me because I didn't like his music.

It goes a lot deeper than just that. It's been a long time coming, and I just wanted to give him a good send off.

Most likely PM stuff behind the scenes. Hope it's temporary though.

You know the details obviously, but from outside it looks like a personal vendetta, which was kind of what he was accusing you of before you banned him. I wouldn't like to think any mod was abusing his power by banning people simply because they didn't agree with/like them. But from out here, it looks pretty bad, to me anyway. Is it temporary or permanent? I have to say I'll miss the little ****.

I now understand why people find it hilarious when I throw a tantrum. Because it's ****ing hilarious when someone else does it. This is gold, Plank. Pure gold.

It's not. 3 strikes and you're out. He actually had a dozen or so, so permaban. I just felt it needed to be done. Actually, for a long time now. It's not anything personal at all. His constant conniving and breaking clear cut rules had opened the flood gates for more of the same behavior from other members. People like Lucem, JWB, and a couple others of that sort were a product of seeing what he could get away with, so they followed his lead. I cut off the source.

I almost feel guilty for constantly trolling him on his last day. Mostly because I would have put more effort into my jokes, had I known. I guess I'll never get the chance to make it right :(

It's okay. You can still take it out on me. I don't mind.

Tuna casserole?! (insert bitchslap)

this thread's interesting. subscribed

I had my days where I thought Chuckie was an ass, but half the time Charles started discussion and created some decent content. I know he was always curbing the line and making the mods work overtime, but I will say this, I'll miss the guy when he was on his best behavior. He listened to alot of hardcore/extreme/thrash stuff that was decent recs half the time. I know hes gone and hes a piece of work, but my first brew to night is for Chas. Peace

forums are dying anyway, i think him being gone will hurt forum activity but the place is slowing down regardless.

Let's skip the slow decline and ban everyone.