Why does there seem to be a stigma attached to advocate for Men's Rights?

DwnWthVwls · 05-03-2017, 10:12 PM

For the 1000000000 time, no one said that about you or thinks that. Not every criticism and discussion is about you or an attack of your personal experience. They are general discussions about controversial topics. Conceited af.

The morally legitimate reason is that its a cosmetic procedure and thats not something that falls under the parents decision to make as a guardian. See my tongue splitting example that you conveintently ignored.

Chula Vista · 05-03-2017, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

Not every criticism and discussion is about you or an attack of your personal experience.

Well, since I decided to have it done to my child, the negatism hits a bit personal.

Quote:

The morally legitimate reason is that its a cosmetic procedure and thats not something that falls under the parents decision to make as a guardian.

It was 100% our decision and legal right under the law. And it was not done for cosmetic purposes. Keep up with my narrative for cripes sake. You keep slamming me for not keeping up with yours. Double standards?

Quote:

See my tongue splitting example that you conveintently ignored.

Ignored because it was absolutley stupid. Same goes for the silicone breast implant analogy that Isborn put forth. (love you Isborn!)

Start running circles around me.

DwnWthVwls · 05-03-2017, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista

Well, since I decided to have it done to my child, the negatism hits a bit personal.

It was 100% our decision and legal right under the law. And it was not done for cosmetic purposes. Keep up with my narrative for cripes sake. You keep slamming me for not keeping up with yours. Double standards?

Ignored because it was absolutley stupid. Same goes for the silicone breast implant analogy that Isborn put forth. (love you Isborn!)

Start running circles around me.

Its clear at this point you dont even understand the discussion and arguments against your position. Also calling something stupid and not explaining why you think so is about as lazy as it gets. The tongue split was a perfectly comparable example but again youre clearly not understanding the discussion. Enjoy your night.

djchameleon · 05-04-2017, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

Its clear at this point you dont even understand the discussion and arguments against your position. Also calling something stupid and not explaining why you think so is about as lazy as it gets. The tongue split was a perfectly comparable example but again youre clearly not understanding the discussion. Enjoy your night.

The tongue split is a horrible example. I thought I responded to it but I don't see my post.

Body mods, piercings and tattoos are all things you need to be 18+ to have that are purely cosmetic.

Male circumcision isn't just purely cosmetic.

DwnWthVwls · 05-04-2017, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon

The tongue split is a horrible example. I thought I responded to it but I don't see my post.

Body mods, piercings and tattoos are all things you need to be 18+ to have that are purely cosmetic.

Male circumcision isn't just purely cosmetic.

Explain. And if youre going to argue about the pontential MINOR health risks associated with keeping it then why arent we removing tonsils and appendixes? Its cosmetic, you just dont want it to be because your position is ****ed without it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan

If it's debunked, could you provide a source. The information I got was from WHO.

WHO | Male circumcision for HIV prevention

Im just going off memory from last time this all came up. I can look but im swamped with work and finals today.

djchameleon · 05-04-2017, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

Argue to me how. And if youre going to argue about the pontential MINOR health risks associated with keeping it then why arent we removing tonsils and appendixes? Its cosmetic, you just dont want it to be because your position is ****ed without it.

Minor health risks are the main reason that it became so popular and that doctors recommended it.

Yes, there are a minority that do it for religious purposes or they just don't like the way that it looks but those two reasons aren't the main reason it became acceptable in the states and other progressive areas.

You savages should all live together in the same place forcing your kids to keep their foreskin.

The Batlord · 05-04-2017, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

Explain. And if youre going to argue about the pontential MINOR health risks associated with keeping it then why arent we removing tonsils and appendixes? Its cosmetic, you just dont want it to be because your position is ****ed without it.

Tonsillectomies and appendectomies are major surgery though. I'm pretty sure doctors don't want to put infants under anaesthesia for long periods of time unless absolutely necessary. I tried Googling it, but I just got a bunch of conflicting reports on how short-term anaesthesia may or may not damage the development of cognitive functions in children under three. Whatever the case, it's clearly not desirable to put very small children under anaesthesia unless necessary.

Anesthesia May Harm Children's Brains

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...it-in-infants/

https://www.asahq.org/about-asa/news...infants?page=4

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista

Man Like Monkey, DownWithVowels, and Goofle.

Redefining melodrama on an hourly basis.

(jeez, these guys are really clinging to their foreskin)

Linda and I chose to have it done to Mike when he was only a couple of days old. I guess we could have also chose to have his tongue split. And his tonsils and appendix ripped out. Maybe even a kidney or lung while we were at it.

How ridiculous does that read?

Just because you have some useless skin hiding the tip of your johnson doesn't give you the right to get all up in arms with the over 80% of us who have beautiful dicks.

Considering just how long it's probably been since she's seen it, I question how beautiful your wife would think your old man dick is now.

Isbjørn · 05-03-2017, 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofle

As stated before, removing the foreskin also reduces sexual pleasure (and can decreases penis size). Again, this is not to equate the two. FGM's roots are more related to the intentional discouragement and reduction of sexual pleasure, whereas circumcision probably doesn't stem from the same subjugation. But it is a side effect that the baby couldn't consent to.

^